Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?

Many educational institutions, especially higher education institutions, are considering to embrace smartphones as part of learning aids in classes as most students (in many cases all students) not only own them but also are also attached to them. The main question is whether embracing smartphones in classroom teaching enhances the learning or perhaps an interference. This paper presents the finding of our study on embracing smartphone in classroom teaching. The study was carried out through a survey and interview/discussion with a focus group of students. We found that they use their smartphones to access teaching materials or supporting information, which are normally accessible through the Internet. Students use smartphones as learning aids due many reasons such as they provide convenience, portability, comprehensive learning experiences, multi sources and multitasks, and environmentally friendly. They also use smartphones to interact with teachers outside classes and using smartphones to manage their group assignments. However, integrating smartphones in a classroom-teaching environment is a challenging task. Lecturers may need to incorporate smartphones in teaching and learning to create attractive teaching and optimum interaction with students in classes while mitigating or at least minimising distractions that can be created. Some of the challenges are distraction, dependency, lacking hands on skills, and the reduce quality of face-to-face interaction. To avoid any disturbances in using smartphones within a classroom environment, proper rules of using smartphones in class should be established before teaching, and students need to abide to these rules.

[1]  Masitah Shahrill,et al.  Technology Integration In The Context Of Brunei Primary Schools , 2015 .

[2]  Denise Chalmers,et al.  Review of Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Society for research into Higher Education , 2012 .

[3]  R. Siemens,et al.  Implementing a Social Knowledge Creation Environment , 2015 .

[4]  Leigh Browning,et al.  The Social Media Affinity Scale: Implications For Education , 2010 .

[5]  Masitah Shahrill,et al.  Integrating ICT and Learning Study in Teaching Conversion of Travel Graphs , 2015 .

[6]  Muhammad Anshari,et al.  Online Learning: trends, issues and challenges in the Big Data Era , 2016 .

[7]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  A(touch)ment: a smartphone extension for instantly sharing visual and tactile experience , 2015, AH.

[8]  Andrea M. Boyle,et al.  Staying Connected: Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication in College Students' Dating Relationships , 2016, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  J. Lam,et al.  Social Media Education: Barriers and Critical Issues , 2015 .

[10]  Harry E. Pence,et al.  Smart Phones, a Powerful Tool in the Chemistry Classroom. , 2011 .

[11]  Benjamin R. Stephens,et al.  Laptops in Psychology: Conducting Flexible In-Class Research and Writing Laboratories , 2005 .

[12]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  Shalini Misra,et al.  The iPhone Effect , 2016 .

[14]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Intimacy and Smartphone Multitasking—A New Oxymoron? , 2016, Psychological reports.

[15]  Heru Susanto,et al.  Revealing Customer Behavior on Smartphones , 2015, Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag..

[16]  Michael Evans Mobility, Games, and Education , 2009 .

[17]  Mariek Vanden Abeele,et al.  Mobile lifestyles: Conceptualizing heterogeneity in mobile youth culture , 2016, New Media Soc..

[18]  Julie Delello,et al.  Multitasking Among College Students: Are Freshmen More Distracted? , 2016, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[19]  Clare Kosnik,et al.  Intertwining Digital Technology and Literacy Methods Courses , 2016 .

[20]  Andreas Schrader,et al.  Dynamix: An open plug-and-play context framework for android , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE International Conference on the Internet of Things.

[21]  Muhammad Anshari,et al.  Pervasive Knowledge, Social Networks, and Cloud Computing: E-Learning 2.0. , 2015 .

[22]  Ada Demb,et al.  The laptop alternative: Student reactions and strategic implications , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[23]  K. C. P. Low,et al.  Incorporating social customer relationship management in negotiation , 2013 .

[24]  Yueh-Chiu Wang Exploring the Causes of Smartphone Dependency and Purchasing Behavior , 2016, 2016 5th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI).

[25]  Radel Ben-Av,et al.  Smartphones , 2016 .

[26]  Reinoud Achterkamp,et al.  The influence of vicarious experience provided through mobile technology on self-efficacy when learning new tasks , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Yabit Alas,et al.  Developing online learning resources: Big data, social networks, and cloud computing to support pervasive knowledge , 2015, Education and Information Technologies.

[28]  Jennifer Cribbs,et al.  Bridging Environments in the Elementary Classroom , 2015 .

[29]  Richard E. Ferdig,et al.  Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education , 2009 .

[30]  Muhammad Anshari,et al.  Smartphones habits, necessities, and big data challenges , 2015 .

[31]  M. Duplá,et al.  Validation of the Preverbal Visual Assessment (PreViAs) questionnaire. , 2014, Early human development.

[32]  G. Boulton‐Lewis Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[33]  B. Perry,et al.  Smartphone Use and Perceptions among Medical Students and Practicing Physicians , 2016 .

[34]  M BoyleAndrea,et al.  Staying Connected: Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication in College Students' Dating Relationships. , 2016 .

[35]  Anne Bradstreet Grinols,et al.  Multitasking With Smartphones in the College Classroom , 2014 .

[36]  Carrie B. Fried,et al.  In-class laptop use and its e V ects on student learning , 2006 .