Redirected Walking in Place

This paper describes a method for allowing people to virtually move around a CAVE™ without ever having to turn to face the missing back wall. We describe the method, and report a pilot study of 28 participants, half of whom moved through the virtual world using a hand-held controller, and the other half used the new technique called 'Redirected Walking in Place' (RWP). The results show that the current instantiation of the RWP technique does not result in a lower frequency of looking towards the missing wall. However, the results also show that the sense of presence in the virtual environment is significantly and negatively correlated with the amount that the back wall is seen. There is evidence that RWP does reduce the chance of seeing the blank wall for some participants. The increased sense of presence through never having to face the blank wall, and the results of this pilot study show the RWP has promise and merits further development.

[1]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Six Generations of Building Walkthrough: Final Technical Report to the National Science Foundation , 1992 .

[2]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Inertial-Force Feedback for the Treadport Locomotion Interface , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  Path Reproduction Tests Using a Torus Treadmill , 1999, Presence.

[4]  Warren Robinett,et al.  Implementation of flying, scaling and grabbing in virtual worlds , 1992, I3D '92.

[5]  Thomas A. Furness,et al.  The Effects of the Interface on Navigation in Virtual Environments , 1998 .

[6]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[7]  Hyeongseok Ko,et al.  Insertion of an articulated human into a networked virtual environment , 1994, Fifth Annual Conference on AI, and Planning in High Autonomy Systems.

[8]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[9]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections , 1998, Spatial Cognition.

[10]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  Taking steps: the influence of a walking technique on presence in virtual reality , 1995, TCHI.

[12]  Randy Pausch,et al.  Virtual reality on a WIM: interactive worlds in miniature , 1995, CHI '95.

[13]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Virtual Presence Counter , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  J. Lackner,et al.  Induction of illusory self-rotation and nystagmus by a rotating sound-field. , 1977, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  Hands-free multi-scale navigation in virtual environments , 2001, I3D '01.

[16]  Rs Kennedy,et al.  A simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ) : A new method for quantifying simulator sickness , 1993 .

[17]  C. Freksa,et al.  Spatial Cognition, An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge , 1998 .

[18]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Design Specifications for the Second Generation Sarcos Treadport Locomotion Interface , 2000, Dynamic Systems and Control: Volume 2.

[19]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  Redirected Walking , 2001, Eurographics.

[20]  Rudy Darken,et al.  The omni-directional treadmill: a locomotion device for virtual worlds , 1997, UIST '97.

[21]  EUROGRAPHICS The European Association for Computer Graphics , 1983 .

[22]  Eugenia M. Kolasinski,et al.  Simulator Sickness in Virtual Environments. , 1995 .

[23]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Influence of Body Movement on Subjective Presence in Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Patricia S. Denbrook,et al.  Virtual Locomotion: Walking in Place through Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence.