Stochastic dominance in multicriterion analysis under risk

Traditionally, in the literature on the modelling of decision aids one notes the propensity to treat expected utility models and outranking relation models as rivals. It may be possible, however, to benefit from the use of both approaches in a risky decision context. Stochastic dominance conditions can be used to establish, for each criterion, the preferences of a decision maker and to characterise them by a concave or convex utility function.Two levels of complexity in preference elicitation, designated as clear and unclear, are distinguished. Only in the case of unclear preferences is it potentially interesting to attempt to estimate the value function of the decision maker, thus obtaining his (her) preferences with a reduced number of questions. The number of questions that must be asked of the decision maker depends upon the level of the concordance threshold that he(she) requires in the construction of the outranking relations using the ELECTRE method.

[1]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[2]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples , 1968 .

[3]  Josef Hadar,et al.  Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects , 1969 .

[4]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing--Yrjo Jahnsson Lectures , 1969 .

[5]  G. Whitmore,et al.  Third-Degree Stochastic Dominance , 1970 .

[6]  V. Bawa OPTIMAL, RULES FOR ORDERING UNCERTAIN PROSPECTS+ , 1975 .

[7]  Eric Jacquet-Lagrèze Modelling Preferences among Distributions Using Fuzzy Relations , 1977 .

[8]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Ambrose Goicoechea,et al.  Multiple objectives under uncertainty: An illustrative application of protrade , 1979 .

[10]  Elias N. Houstis,et al.  Multiobjective decisions analysis for engineering systems , 1980, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  J. Leclercq Stochastic programming: An interactive multicriteria approach , 1982 .

[12]  Gilles R. d'Avignon,et al.  Projects ordering with multicriteria analysis , 1982 .

[13]  Haim Levy,et al.  Portfolio and Investment Selection: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[14]  J. Teghem,et al.  STRANGE: an interactive method for multi-objective linear programming under uncertainty , 1986 .

[15]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Stochastic multicriteria decision-making and uncertainty , 1986 .

[16]  Jean-Marc Martel,et al.  A fuzzy outranking relation in multicriteria decision making , 1986 .

[17]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[18]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  An outranking method under uncertainty , 1988 .

[19]  Mars: A multiattribute utility ranking support for risk situations with a “P,Q,I,R” relational system of preferences , 1989 .

[20]  J. Siskos,et al.  Multicriteria highway planning: A case study , 1989 .

[21]  Alan Pearman,et al.  Models and Methods in Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 1991 .