Does Prey Capture Induce Area‐Restricted Search? A Fine‐Scale Study Using GPS in a Marine Predator, the Wandering Albatross

In a patchy environment, predators are expected to increase turning rate and start an area‐restricted search (ARS) when prey have been encountered, but few empirical data exist for large predators. By using GPS loggers with devices measuring prey capture, we studied how a marine predator adjusts foraging movements at various scales in relation to prey capture. Wandering albatrosses use two tactics, sit and wait and foraging in flight, the former tactic being three times less efficient than the latter. During flight foraging, birds caught large isolated prey and used ARS at scales varying from 5 to 90 km, with large‐scale ARS being used only by young animals. Birds did not show strong responses to prey capture at a large scale, few ARS events occurred after prey capture, and birds did not have high rates of prey capture in ARS. Only at small scales did birds increase sinuosity after prey captures for a limited time period, and this occurred only after they had caught a large prey item within an ARS zone. When this species searches over a large scale, the most effective search rule was to follow a nearly straight path. ARS may be used to restrict search to a particular environment where prey capture is more predictable and profitable.

[1]  G. Peters,et al.  Long-term attachment of transmitting and recording devices to penguins and other seabirds , 1997 .

[2]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[3]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[4]  E. Werner,et al.  Ecological Consequences of the Trade-Off between Growth and Mortality Rates Mediated by Foraging Activity , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[5]  R. Phillips,et al.  Foraging strategies of grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma: integration of movements, activity and feeding events , 2004 .

[6]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  PREY DISTRIBUTION AND PATCHINESS: FACTORS IN FORAGING SUCCESS AND EFFICIENCY OF WANDERING ALBATROSSES , 2005 .

[7]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  GPS Tracking of Foraging Albatrosses , 2002, Science.

[8]  P. Fauchald,et al.  Foraging in a Hierarchical Patch System , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Alan E. Burger,et al.  Foraging Behavior and Physiological Adaptation for Diving in Thick‐Billed Murres , 1992 .

[10]  D. Costa,et al.  Fast and fuel efficient? Optimal use of wind by flying albatrosses , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Seasonal changes in the provisioning behaviour and mass of male and female wandering albatrosses in relation to the growth of their chick , 2000, Polar Biology.

[12]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Oceanic respite for wandering albatrosses , 2000, Nature.

[13]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[14]  Torkild Tveraa,et al.  USING FIRST‐PASSAGE TIME IN THE ANALYSIS OF AREA‐RESTRICTED SEARCH AND HABITAT SELECTION , 2003 .

[15]  Prof. Dr. Eberhard Curio The Ethology of Predation , 1976, Zoophysiology and Ecology.

[16]  K. Fausch,et al.  Experimentally induced foraging mode shift by sympatric charrs in a Japanese mountain stream , 1997 .

[17]  S. Benhamou,et al.  Spatial analysis of animals' movements using a correlated random walk model* , 1988 .

[18]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Banding Recoveries and the Dispersal of Seabirds Breeding in French Austral and Antarctic Territories , 1985 .

[19]  Philip D. Taylor,et al.  Changing importance of habitat structure across multiple spatial scales for three species of insects , 2003 .

[20]  David Pinaud,et al.  Quantifying search effort of moving animals at several spatial scales using first‐passage time analysis: effect of the structure of environment and tracking systems , 2007 .

[21]  W. Cleveland LOWESS: A Program for Smoothing Scatterplots by Robust Locally Weighted Regression , 1981 .

[22]  Wilson,et al.  Reliability of stomach temperature changes in determining feeding characteristics of seabirds , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[23]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Activity pattern of foraging in the wandering albatross: a marine predator with two modes of prey searching , 1997 .

[24]  Deborah Austin,et al.  Linking movement, diving, and habitat to foraging success in a large marine predator. , 2006, Ecology.

[25]  Robert Lee Schooley,et al.  Patchy Landscapes and Animal Movements: Do Beetles Percolate? , 1997 .

[26]  S. Benhamou How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path: straightness, sinuosity, or fractal dimension? , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  D. Costa,et al.  Behavioural factors affecting foraging effort of breeding wandering albatrosses , 2001 .

[28]  D. Sims,et al.  Selective foraging behaviour of basking sharks on zooplankton in a small-scale front , 1998, Nature.

[29]  P. Kareiva Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data , 1990 .

[30]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Pelagic seabirds and the marine environment: foraging patterns of wandering albatrosses in relation to prey availability and distribution , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  John P. Croxall,et al.  EFFECTS OF SATELLITE TRANSMITTERS ON ALBATROSSES AND PETRELS , 2003 .

[32]  G. Nevitt,et al.  Olfactory foraging by Antarctic procellariiform seabirds: life at high Reynolds numbers. , 2000, The Biological bulletin.

[33]  P. Nonacs State dependent behavior and the Marginal Value Theorem , 2001 .

[34]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[35]  H. Hirvonen Shifts in foraging tactics of larval damselflies : effects of prey density , 1999 .

[36]  E. Pianka Convexity, Desert Lizards, and Spatial Heterogeneity , 1966 .

[37]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Population Dynamics of the Wandering Albatross, Diomedea exulans, of the Crozet Islands: Causes and Consequences of the Population Decline , 1987 .

[38]  Pierre Jouventin,et al.  Foraging Strategy of Wandering Albatrosses Through The Breeding Season: A Study Using Satellite Telemetry , 1993 .

[39]  H. Weimerskirch Regulation of foraging trips and incubation routine in male and female wandering albatrosses , 1995, Oecologia.

[40]  Peter D. Walsh,et al.  Area-restricted Search and the Scale Dependence of Path Quality Discrimination , 1996 .

[41]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Spawning cycle of onychoteuthid squids in the southern Indian Ocean:new information from seabird predators , 1999 .

[42]  G. Odell,et al.  Swarms of Predators Exhibit "Preytaxis" if Individual Predators Use Area-Restricted Search , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Henri Weimerskirch,et al.  Scale‐dependent habitat use in a long‐ranging central place predator , 2005 .

[44]  H. Fritz,et al.  Scale–dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long–range foraging seabird , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Hans-Peter Lipp,et al.  A GPS logger and software for analysis of homing in pigeons and small mammals , 2000, Physiology & Behavior.

[46]  R. Veit,et al.  Nearest neighbors as foraging cues: information transfer in a patchy environment , 2004 .

[47]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.