Evaluation of two different reinforcing materials used with silicone auricular prostheses

[1]  G. Polyzois,et al.  Irritation test of tissue adhesives for facial prostheses. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  B. K. Moore,et al.  Color stability and colorant effect on maxillofacial elastomers. Part II: weathering effect on physical properties. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  C. Andres,et al.  Effects of environmental factors on maxillofacial elastomers: Part I--Literature review. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  A. Udagama.  Urethane-lined silicone facial prostheses. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  J. Wolfaardt,et al.  Mechanical properties of a new facial prosthetic material. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  D. J. Moore,et al.  In vitro comparison study of MDX-4-4210 and polydimethyl siloxane silicone materials. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  D J Castleberry,et al.  An assessment of recent advances in external maxillofacial materials. , 1980, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  J. A. Salzmann,et al.  Maxillofacial rehabilitation: Prosthetic and surgical considerations , 1980 .

[9]  K. An,et al.  Physical and mechanical behavior of polyurethane elastomer formulations used for facial prostheses. , 1978, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  H Löe,et al.  The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. , 1967, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  H. Löe,et al.  PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. I. PREVALENCE AND SEVERITY. , 1963, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.