Comparison of Indian and Central European Shape Contour Meaning Comprehension

Since every culture has their own specifics, there is often the question, whether customers from diverse cultures perceive shape characteristics equally or differently? This study explore how two different cultural groups (Indian vs. Central European) of participants experience or response to predefined four types of product dimensions—aesthetic, functional, social and future. We assume that the Central-European and Indian students differ by their perception of different shapes. To gather the necessary statistical data, we prepared questionnaires wherein the samples were assessed using the semantic differential technique and a five-level Likert scale. The responses were then analyzed using Factor analysis. After conducting statistical analysis using Factor analysis, two main affective dimensions were gained, which show how differentiate Central-European and Indian participants. The methodology presented in this study can help designers to identify a pattern of consumer shape categorization.

[1]  Merle Crawford,et al.  Design that sells and sells and , 1992 .

[2]  R. Nisbett The geography of thought : how Asians and Westerners think differently--and why , 2003 .

[3]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[4]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[5]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[6]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement , 2003 .

[7]  Lydia J. Price,et al.  The Impact of Self-Construal on Aesthetic Preference for Angular Versus Rounded Shapes , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[8]  J. M. Carroll,et al.  On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  Simon Schütte,et al.  Engineering Emotional Values in Product Design : Kansei Engineering in Development , 2005 .

[10]  Steve Derné,et al.  The (limited) effect of cultural globalization in India: implications for culture theory , 2005 .

[11]  P. Ekman,et al.  Pan-Cultural Elements in Facial Displays of Emotion , 1969, Science.

[12]  Keyoor Purani,et al.  Comparing the importance of luxury value perceptions in cross-national contexts ☆ , 2012 .

[13]  P A Russell The aesthetics of rectangle proportion: effects of judgment scale and context. , 2000, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  M. Douglas,et al.  The World of Goods , 2021 .

[15]  Tom Peters,et al.  Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity and Image , 1997 .

[16]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[17]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  GLOBALIZATION AND CROSS CULTURAL PRODUCT DESIGN , 2006 .

[18]  D. Matsumoto,et al.  American-Japanese Cultural Differences in Judgements of Expression Intensity and Subjective Experience , 1999 .