Classroom noise and children learning through a second language: double jeopardy?

PURPOSE Two studies were conducted to investigate the effects of classroom noise on attention and speech perception in native Spanish-speaking second graders learning English as their second language (L2) as compared to English-only-speaking (EO) peers. METHOD Study 1 measured children's on-task behavior during instructional activities with and without soundfield amplification. Study 2 measured the effects of noise (+10 dB signal-to-noise ratio) using an experimental English word recognition task. RESULTS Findings from Study 1 revealed no significant condition (pre/postamplification) or group differences in observations in on-task performance. Main findings from Study 2 were that word recognition performance declined significantly for both L2 and EO groups in the noise condition; however, the impact was disproportionately greater for the L2 group. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Children learning in their L2 appear to be at a distinct disadvantage when listening in rooms with typical noise and reverberation. Speech-language pathologists and audiologists should collaborate to inform teachers, help reduce classroom noise, increase signal levels, and improve access to spoken language for L2 learners.

[1]  Heather A. Knecht,et al.  Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements. , 2002, American journal of audiology.

[2]  J. Windsor,et al.  The search for common ground: Part II. Nonlinguistic performance by linguistically diverse learners. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  Carl C. Crandell,et al.  Speech Perception in Noise by Children for Whom English Is a Second Language , 1996 .

[5]  A. Eriks-Brophy,et al.  The Benefits of Sound Field Amplification in Classrooms of Inuit Students of Nunavik: A Pilot Project. , 2000, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[6]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  A K Nábĕlek,et al.  Perception of consonants in reverberation by native and non-native listeners. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  K. Kohnert,et al.  Picture naming in early sequential bilinguals: a 1-year follow-up. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  K. Hustad,et al.  Implementing speech supplementation strategies: effects on intelligibility and speech rate of individuals with chronic severe dysarthria. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  S Buus,et al.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  Joy Stackhouse,et al.  Children's Speech and Literacy Difficulties: A Psycholinguistic Framework , 1997 .

[12]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[13]  C. Johnson,et al.  Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  L. L. Elliott Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Sigfrid D. Soli,et al.  Factors affecting children’s speech communication in classrooms , 1997 .

[16]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[17]  Brian A. Goldstein,et al.  Transcription of Spanish and Spanish-Influenced English , 2001 .

[18]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B. Lindblom On the communication process: Speaker-listener interaction and the development of speech* , 1990 .

[20]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Timed picture naming in seven languages , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Fifty years of language maintenance and language dominance in bilingual Hispanic immigrants. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  A M Tharpe,et al.  Speech recognition ability of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss as a function of amplification, speech stimuli and listening condition. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[23]  F H Bess,et al.  Group Amplification in Schools for the Hearing Impaired , 1984, Ear and hearing.

[24]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[25]  C. Palmer Quantification of the ecobehavioral impact of a soundfield loudspeaker system in elementary classrooms. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.