Application of the modified barrier method in large-scale quadratic programming problems

The application of the penalty/modified barrier function method (PE/MBF) is presented for the solution of large-scale positive-semidefinite quadratic programming problems (QP). A review of the recent literature on QP methods is presented and the choice of the PE/MBF method for QP problems is justified by previous experience in very large-scale bound-constrained problems. The proposed algorithm performs two types of iterations: an outer iteration in which the Lagrange multipliers of the bounds are adjusted, and an inner iteration for the solution of an equality constrained subproblem. The inner iteration solves a modified problem, containing penalty/modified barrier terms for the bounds in the objective, and is subject to equality constraints only. The equality constraints are handled directly via the use of additional Lagrange multipliers during the inner iteration and thus, instead of an unconstrained problem, the inner iteration solves a modified equality constrained problem. Any inequality constraints, other than bounds, are formulated as equalities via the use of slack variables. Computational results show this method to be promising, and motivate further investigation for the general case of nonlinear programming problems.

[1]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design , 1997 .

[2]  David F. Shanno,et al.  Computational experience with penalty-barrier methods for nonlinear programming , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  The modified barrier function approach for large-scale optimization , 1997 .

[4]  Chung Long Chen A class of successive quadratic programming methods for flowsheet optimisation , 1988 .

[5]  A. Lucia,et al.  Sparse quadratic programming in chemical process optimization , 1993, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  A. Lucia,et al.  Chemical process optimization using Newton-like methods , 1990 .

[7]  Roman A. Polyak,et al.  Modified barrier functions (theory and methods) , 1992, Math. Program..

[8]  W. Hager,et al.  Large Scale Optimization : State of the Art , 1993 .

[9]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Reduced successive quadratic programming implementation for large-scale optimization problems with smaller degrees of freedom , 1990 .

[10]  S. Nash,et al.  A Numerical Comparison of Barrier and Modified Barrier Methods for Large-Scale Bound-Constrained Optimization , 1994 .

[11]  Ding Mei,et al.  New Developments for Large-scale Nonlinear Programming , 1994 .

[12]  Anthony V. Fiacco,et al.  Nonlinear programming;: Sequential unconstrained minimization techniques , 1968 .

[13]  David F. Shanno,et al.  Preliminary Computational Experience with Modified Log-Barrier Functions for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming , 1994 .

[14]  L. Biegler,et al.  Large-scale decomposition for successive quadratic programming , 1988 .

[15]  R. Fletcher Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .