Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis was aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. The databases of PubMed, Web of Science(TM), WanFang, Vip, SinoMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for all studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of ARFI including virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) and virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI). All the studies were published prior to Mar. 21, 2014. The studies published in English or Chinese were collected. A total of 11 studies, including 1,408 breast lesions from 1,245 women, were analyzed. The values of summary sensitivity and summary specificity were 0.843 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.811-0.872) and 0.932 (95% CI: 0.913-0.948) for VTQ of ARFI, and 0.864 (95% CI: 0.799-0.914) and 0.882 (95% CI: 0.832-0.922) for VTI of ARFI, respectively. Subgroup analysis excluding mucinous carcinoma and carcinoma in situ showed higher summary sensitivity (0.877 95% CI: 0.835-0.911), higher summary specificity (0.943 95% CI: 0.921-0.960) and lower heterogeneity (I(2)=23.5%). The cut-off values for shear wave velocity of VTQ ranged widely from 2.89 to 6.71 m/s, while the VTI ranged narrowly from 1.37 to 1.66. In general, ARFI elastography seems to be a good method for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. However, its usefulness for identifying breast mucinous carcinoma and breast carcinoma in situ is limited. VTI seems to be more reliable and repeatable than VTQ.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[2]  D. Vanel.  The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[3]  S. Emelianov,et al.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  M. Mainiero,et al.  BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. , 2006, Radiology.

[5]  Sachiko Isobe,et al.  Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses , 2012, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[6]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  P. Wolf,et al.  In Vivo Cardiac, Acoustic-Radiation-Force-Driven, Shear Wave Velocimetry , 2009, Ultrasonic imaging.

[8]  H. Sasano,et al.  A non-invasive modality: the US virtual touch tissue quantification (VTTQ) for evaluation of breast cancer. , 2013, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[9]  Li Ying,et al.  Performance of Shear Wave Elastography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Solid Breast Masses , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Colleen H. Neal,et al.  Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[11]  Min Bai,et al.  Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[12]  M. Leeflang,et al.  Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. , 2008, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  L. Heuser,et al.  Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Alexandru Blidaru,et al.  Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[15]  G. Trahey,et al.  Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  M. Tozaki,et al.  Shear wave velocity measurements for differential diagnosis of solid breast masses: a comparison between virtual touch quantification and virtual touch IQ. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Xing Huang,et al.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of breast imaging reporting and data system category 4 breast lesions. , 2012, Clinical breast cancer.

[18]  Kun Peng,et al.  Quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse in differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  Yan Song,et al.  Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) ultrasound imaging of breast lesions. , 2011, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Susan Mallett,et al.  A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Comparative effect sizes in randomised trials from less developed and more developed countries: meta-epidemiological assessment , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.