On the Relevance of Behavioral Decision Research for Decision Analysis

[1]  Terry Connolly,et al.  Decomposed versus holistic estimates of effort required for software writing tasks , 1997 .

[2]  A. Smidts.  The relationship between risk attitude and strength of preference: a test of intrinsic risk attitude , 1997 .

[3]  Bruce E. Barrett,et al.  Decision quality using ranked attribute weights , 1996 .

[4]  P. Wakker,et al.  Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown , 1996 .

[5]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  Hailfinder: A Bayesian system for forecasting severe weather , 1996 .

[6]  D von Winterfeldt,et al.  Managing electromagnetic fields from residential electrode grounding systems: a predecision analysis. , 1996, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  Young-Hee Cho,et al.  Tests of Hypotheses about Certainty Equivalents and Joint Receipt of Gambles , 1995 .

[8]  P. Fishburn,et al.  A note on deriving rank-dependent utility using additive joint receipts , 1995 .

[9]  G. W. Fischer.  Range Sensitivity of Attribute Weights in Multiattribute Value Models , 1995 .

[10]  A. Coelho,et al.  Effects of concurrent exposure to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields on the social behavior of baboons. , 1995, Bioelectromagnetics.

[11]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Judgmental Decomposition: When Does it Work? , 1994 .

[12]  R. Luce,et al.  What common ground exists for descriptive, prescriptive, and normative utility theories? , 1994 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory , 1993 .

[14]  T. Modis,et al.  Experts in uncertainty , 1993 .

[15]  Martin Weber,et al.  The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements , 1993 .

[16]  Max Henrion,et al.  Divide and Conquer? Effects of Decomposition on the Accuracy and Calibration of Subjective Probability Distributions , 1993 .

[17]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. , 1993 .

[18]  Nancy G. Dodd,et al.  The use of decomposition in probability assessments of continuous variables , 1993 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[20]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement , 1991 .

[21]  M. B. Triplett,et al.  Tank Waste Disposal Program redefinition , 1991 .

[22]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems , 1991 .

[23]  Gerald J. Lobo.  Alternative methods of combining security analysts' and statistical forecasts of annual corporate earnings , 1991 .

[24]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for binary gambles , 1991 .

[25]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Preferences for separating or combining events. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  P. Fishburn,et al.  Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles , 1991 .

[27]  R. Thaler,et al.  Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice , 1990 .

[28]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  The effect of varying value trees on multiattribute evaluations , 1988 .

[29]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Rank-dependent, subjective expected-utility representations , 1988 .

[30]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  The effects of splitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement , 1988 .

[31]  M. W. Merkhofer,et al.  Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[32]  R L Keeney,et al.  A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Preferences for proxy attributes , 1987 .

[34]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[35]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Probability Versus Certainty Equivalence Methods in Utility Measurement: Are they Equivalent? , 1985 .

[36]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  An empirical investigation of relative risk aversion , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[37]  William R. Ferrell,et al.  Combining Individual Judgments , 1985 .

[38]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Empirical and theoretical relationships between value and utility functions , 1984 .

[39]  H. Jungermann,et al.  The Role of the Goal for Generating Actions , 1983 .

[40]  Richard S. John,et al.  The Quality and User Acceptance of Multiat-Tribute Utility Analysis Performed by Computer and Analyst , 1983 .

[41]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Decision Making: SOURCES OF BIAS IN ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR UTILITY FUNCTIONS , 1982 .

[42]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[43]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Debiasing , 1982 .

[44]  A. Tversky,et al.  Intuitive Prediction: Biases and Corrective Procedures , 1982 .

[45]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Analysis of Preference Dependencies among Objectives , 1981, Oper. Res..

[46]  D. A. Seaver,et al.  A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making , 1981 .

[47]  Richard S. John,et al.  The Quality and User Acceptance of Decision Analysis Performed by Computer vs. Analyst. , 1981 .

[48]  G. Pitz,et al.  Procedures for eliciting choices in the analysis of individual decisions , 1980 .

[49]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Additivity and expected utility in risky multiattribute preferences , 1980 .

[50]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[51]  P. Fishburn,et al.  TWO‐PIECE VON NEUMANN‐MORGENSTERN UTILITY FUNCTIONS* , 1979 .

[52]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  A Memory Retrieval Aid for Hypothesis Generation. , 1979 .

[53]  R. Dawes.  Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[54]  E. Poulton.  Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[56]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Are Important Weights Sensitive to the Range of Alternatives in Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1978 .

[57]  C. Gettys,et al.  Hypothesis Generation and Plausibility Assessment. , 1978 .

[58]  D. A. Seaver,et al.  Eliciting subjective probability distributions on continuous variables , 1978 .

[59]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. , 1978 .

[60]  Ward Edwards,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[61]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Convergent validation of decomposed multi-attribute utility assessment procedures for risky and riskless decisions , 1977 .

[62]  Howard Wainer,et al.  Estimating Coefficients in Linear Models: It Don't Make No Nevermind , 1976 .

[63]  Carl-Axel S. Staël von Holstein,et al.  Exceptional Paper---Probability Encoding in Decision Analysis , 1975 .

[64]  J. Armstrong.  The Use of the Decomposition Principle in Making Judgments , 1975 .

[65]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Unit weighting schemes for decision making , 1975 .

[66]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[67]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[68]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Probabilistic Information Processing Systems: Design and Evaluation , 1968, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[69]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  The Foundations of Decision Analysis , 1968, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[70]  E. Ghiselli.  Theory of psychological measurement , 1964 .

[71]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processings1 , 1962 .

[72]  W. Edwards.  Behavioral decision theory. , 1961, Annual review of psychology.

[73]  W. Edwards.  The theory of decision making. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.