Auditory Decision Aiding in Supervisory Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Objective: This article is an investigation of the effectiveness of sonifications, which are continuous auditory alerts mapped to the state of a monitored task, in supporting unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) supervisory control. Background: UAV supervisory control requires monitoring a UAV across multiple tasks (e.g., course maintenance) via a predominantly visual display, which currently is supported with discrete auditory alerts. Sonification has been shown to enhance monitoring performance in domains such as anesthesiology by allowing an operator to immediately determine an entity’s (e.g., patient) current and projected states, and is a promising alternative to discrete alerts in UAV control. However, minimal research compares sonification to discrete alerts, and no research assesses the effectiveness of sonification for monitoring multiple entities (e.g., multiple UAVs). Method: The authors conducted an experiment with 39 military personnel, using a simulated setup. Participants controlled single and multiple UAVs and received sonifications or discrete alerts based on UAV course deviations and late target arrivals. Results: Regardless of the number of UAVs supervised, the course deviation sonification resulted in reactions to course deviations that were 1.9 s faster, a 19% enhancement, compared with discrete alerts. However, course deviation sonifications interfered with the effectiveness of discrete late arrival alerts in general and with operator responses to late arrivals when supervising multiple vehicles. Conclusions: Sonifications can outperform discrete alerts when designed to aid operators to predict future states of monitored tasks. However, sonifications may mask other auditory alerts and interfere with other monitoring tasks that require divided attention. Applications: This research has implications for supervisory control display design.

[1]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[2]  J Miller,et al.  Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Decision Support Visualizations for Schedule Management of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2007 .

[4]  Linda R. Elliott,et al.  Comparing the effects of visual-auditory and visual-tactile feedback on user performance: a meta-analysis , 2006, ICMI '06.

[5]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of human factors. , 1987 .

[6]  David Woods,et al.  The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management , 1995 .

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[8]  Bertram Scharf,et al.  Experimental Sensory Psychology , 1975 .

[9]  David Penn,et al.  Development Trends for Next Generation of UAV Systems , 2007 .

[10]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Mission Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Workload Analysis , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Effects of Single Versus Multiple Warnings on Driver Performance , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Marcus Watson,et al.  Sonification Supports Eyes-Free Respiratory Monitoring and Task Time-Sharing , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Robert H. McKim,et al.  Human engineering guide to equipment design , 1963 .

[14]  H. D. Graham,et al.  ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF HAPTIC PERIPHERAL DISPLAYS FOR UAV OPERATORS , 2008 .

[15]  Carolyn MacGregor,et al.  Auditory Cues for Monitoring a Background Process: A comparative Evaluation , 2001, INTERACT.

[16]  C. A. Simpson,et al.  Response Time Effects of Alerting Tone and Semantic Context for Synthesized Voice Cockpit Warnings , 1980, Human factors.

[17]  Janaf Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design , 1984 .

[18]  Robert G Loeb,et al.  A laboratory evaluation of an auditory display designed to enhance intraoperative monitoring. , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  Stephen Barrass,et al.  Using sonification , 1999, Multimedia Systems.

[20]  Gregory Kramer,et al.  Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, And Auditory Interfaces , 1994 .

[21]  R. Patterson Auditory warning sounds in the work environment. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.