Differences between the time constant of sensory and motor peripheral nerve fibers: Further studies and considerations

Using a method of latent addition, we previously demonstrated that sensory fibers had time constants that were about three times longer than those of motor fibers. The aim of the present work was to confirm this difference by determining the time constants for single sensory axons by using microneurography and for single motor axons by recording single motor units with bipolar concentric needle electrodes. To determine the influence of the conditioning pulse on the neural time constant, we used both depolarizing and hyperpolarizing conditioning pulses. When hyperpolarizing conditioning pulses at comparable intensity were applied, the tendency was to find shorter time constants than when depolarizing pulses were applied, although still with the motor time constant being slightly shorter. Although the absolute values varied with the different methods, the sensory time constant was generally three times the motor time constant for depolarizing conditioning stimuli, whereas for hyperpolarizing conditioning stimuli the difference dropped to about one and a half. These characteristics improve understanding of the behavior of sensory and motor axons, and, in particular, explain the differential excitability. Determination of neural time constants might prove valuable for clinical use. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve, 21: 48–54, 1998.

[1]  Bl Day,et al.  NEAR THRESHOLD ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC TRANSCRANIAL STIMULI ACTIVATE OVERLAPPING SETS OF CORTICAL-NEURONS IN HUMANS , 1992 .

[2]  Garnham Cw,et al.  Magnetic nerve stimulation: the effect of waveform on efficiency, determination of neural membrane time constants and the measurement of stimulator output. , 1991 .

[3]  M. Hugon Methodology of the Hoffmann Reflex in Man , 1973 .

[4]  M. Mengel,et al.  Identification and characterization of afferent periodontal A delta fibres in the cat. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Stimulus waveforms for selective neural stimulation , 1995 .

[6]  M. Hallett,et al.  Optimal stimulus duration for the H reflex , 1989, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  D Burke,et al.  Strength-duration properties of human peripheral nerve. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Latent addition in motor and sensory fibres of human peripheral nerve. , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  M. Hallett,et al.  Velocity sensitivity of human muscle spindle afferents and slowly adapting type II cutaneous mechanoreceptors. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Sensory potentials and sural nerve biopsy: A Model evaluation , 1987, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  J Nilsson,et al.  The time constants of motor and sensory peripheral nerve fibers measured with the method of latent addition. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  R. Mark,et al.  Differential sensitivity of motor and sensory fibres in human ulnar nerve , 1973, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  D Dumitru,et al.  Anodal block V anodal stimulation. Fact or fiction. , 1993, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[14]  Ichiji Tasaki,et al.  Physiology and electrochemistry of nerve fibers , 1982 .

[15]  Relevance of stimulus duration for activation of motor and sensory fibers: implications for the study of H-reflexes and magnetic stimulation. , 1992 .