Scaling marine fish movement behavior from individuals to populations

Abstract Understanding how, where, and when animals move is a central problem in marine ecology and conservation. Key to improving our knowledge about what drives animal movement is the rising deployment of telemetry devices on a range of free‐roaming species. An increasingly popular way of gaining meaningful inference from an animal's recorded movements is the application of hidden Markov models (HMMs), which allow for the identification of latent behavioral states in the movement paths of individuals. However, the use of HMMs to explore the population‐level consequences of movement is often limited by model complexity and insufficient sample sizes. Here, we introduce an alternative approach to current practices and provide evidence of how the inclusion of prior information in model structure can simplify the application of HMMs to multiple animal movement paths with two clear benefits: (a) consistent state allocation and (b) increases in effective sample size. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we apply HMMs and adapted HMMs to over 100 multivariate movement paths consisting of conditionally dependent daily horizontal and vertical movements in two species of demersal fish: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua; n = 46) and European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa; n = 61). We identify latent states corresponding to two main underlying behaviors: resident and migrating. As our analysis considers a relatively large sample size and states are allocated consistently, we use collective model output to investigate state‐dependent spatiotemporal trends at the individual and population levels. In particular, we show how both species shift their movement behaviors on a seasonal basis and demonstrate population space use patterns that are consistent with previous individual‐level studies. Tagging studies are increasingly being used to inform stock assessment models, spatial management strategies, and monitoring of marine fish populations. Our approach provides a promising way of adding value to tagging studies because inferences about movement behavior can be gained from a larger proportion of datasets, making tagging studies more relevant to management and more cost‐effective.

[1]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Multi-scale Modeling of Animal Movement and General Behavior Data Using Hidden Markov Models with Hierarchical Structures , 2017, Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics.

[2]  Peter J. Wright,et al.  Residency and depth movements of a coastal group of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) , 2006 .

[3]  Etienne Rivot,et al.  Identifying fishing trip behaviour and estimating fishing effort from VMS data using Bayesian Hidden Markov Models , 2010 .

[4]  J. Kocik,et al.  Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world , 2015, Science.

[5]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  Addressing Challenges in the Application of Animal Movement Ecology to Aquatic Conservation and Management , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[6]  W. Zucchini,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R , 2009 .

[7]  Brandon L Southall,et al.  A multivariate mixed hidden Markov model to analyze blue whale diving behaviour during controlled sound exposures , 2016, 1602.06570.

[8]  Julian D. Metcalfe,et al.  Link between vertical and horizontal movement patterns of cod in the North Sea , 2009 .

[9]  Sophie Bestley,et al.  Taking animal tracking to new depths: synthesizing horizontal--vertical movement relationships for four marine predators. , 2015, Ecology.

[10]  Sara M. Maxwell,et al.  Using Satellite Tracking to Optimize Protection of Long-Lived Marine Species: Olive Ridley Sea Turtle Conservation in Central Africa , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Statistical modelling of individual animal movement: an overview of key methods and a discussion of practical challenges , 2016, AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis.

[12]  Ian Jonsen,et al.  Joint estimation over multiple individuals improves behavioural state inference from animal movement data , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Brett T. McClintock,et al.  Combining individual animal movement and ancillary biotelemetry data to investigate population-level activity budgets , 2013 .

[14]  S. Gende,et al.  Post-Breeding Season Migrations of a Top Predator, the Harbor Seal (Phoca vitulina richardii), from a Marine Protected Area in Alaska , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  S. Tilak,et al.  The Movebank data model for animal tracking , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  J. Wiseman,et al.  The general bathymetric chart of the oceans , 1955 .

[17]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  The migratory behaviour of North Sea plaice: Currents, clocks and clues , 2006 .

[18]  K. M. Schaefer,et al.  Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean , 2011, Nature.

[19]  C. S. Wardle,et al.  Fish swimming stride by stride: speed limits and endurance , 1991, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[20]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Impacts of migratory behaviour on population structure in North Sea plaice , 2004 .

[21]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Analysis of animal accelerometer data using hidden Markov models , 2016, 1602.06466.

[22]  R. Bainbridge,et al.  The Speed of Swimming of Fish as Related to Size and to the Frequency and Amplitude of the Tail Beat , 1958 .

[23]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Sex-specific and individual preferences for hunting strategies in white sharks , 2016 .

[24]  Peter J. Wright,et al.  Movement of Atlantic cod around the British Isles: implications for finer scale stock management , 2014 .

[25]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Roland Langrock,et al.  moveHMM: an R package for the statistical modelling of animal movement data using hidden Markov models , 2016 .

[27]  Greg A Breed,et al.  Behavioral signature of intraspecific competition and density dependence in colony-breeding marine predators , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[28]  Toby A Patterson,et al.  Objective classification of latent behavioral states in bio-logging data using multivariate-normal hidden Markov models. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[29]  Luis A. Hückstädt,et al.  Circumpolar habitat use in the southern elephant seal: implications for foraging success and population trajectories , 2016 .

[30]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Estimation and simulation of foraging trips in land-based marine predators. , 2016, Ecology.

[31]  Lisa M. Wedding,et al.  Fish with Chips: Tracking Reef Fish Movements to Evaluate Size and Connectivity of Caribbean Marine Protected Areas , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  Identifying leatherback turtle foraging behaviour from satellite telemetry using a switching state-space model , 2007 .

[33]  Rainer Froese,et al.  FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. , 2014 .

[34]  MARK S. LINDBERG,et al.  Satellite Telemetry in Avian Research and Management: Sample Size Considerations , 2007 .

[35]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Geolocation of North Sea cod (Gadus morhua) using hidden Markov models and behavioural switching , 2008 .

[36]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Using mixed hidden Markov models to examine behavioral states in a cooperatively breeding bird , 2015 .

[37]  M. Witt,et al.  Global analysis of satellite tracking data shows that adult green turtles are significantly aggregated in Marine Protected Areas , 2012 .

[38]  John D. Reynolds,et al.  Vertical activity patterns of free-swimming adult plaice in the southern North Sea , 2004 .

[39]  David Peel,et al.  A hidden Markov model approach for determining vessel activity from vessel monitoring system data , 2011 .

[40]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Integrating research using animal‐borne telemetry with the needs of conservation management , 2017 .

[41]  John D. Reynolds,et al.  Migration route and spawning area fidelity by North Sea plaice , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  To share or not to share in the emerging era of big data: perspectives from fish telemetry researchers on data sharing , 2017 .

[43]  Kim Holland,et al.  Key Questions in Marine Megafauna Movement Ecology. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Daniel P. Costa,et al.  New Insights into Pelagic Migrations: Implications for Ecology and Conservation , 2012 .

[45]  Julian D. Metcalfe,et al.  Vertical movements of North Sea cod , 2007 .

[46]  W. Silvert,et al.  A spatially explicit learning model of migratory fish and fishers for evaluating closed areas , 2006 .

[47]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2 , 2013, R J..

[48]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[49]  G. Huse,et al.  Thermal niche of Atlantic cod Gadus morhua: limits, tolerance and optima , 2010 .

[50]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Tracking fish with electronic tags , 1997, Nature.

[51]  M. Hindell,et al.  Important marine habitat off east Antarctica revealed by two decades of multi-species predator tracking , 2015 .

[52]  Martin Wæver Pedersen,et al.  State-space models for bio-loggers: A methodological road map , 2013 .

[53]  John Calambokidis,et al.  A multivariate mixed hidden Markov model for blue whale behaviour and responses to sound exposure , 2017 .

[54]  B. Worton Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[55]  Julian Metcalfe,et al.  Fisheries: Different behaviour of North and Irish Sea cod , 2001, Nature.

[56]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  Victoria Quayle,et al.  Movements and distribution of cod (Gadus morhua) in the southern North Sea and English Channel: results from conventional and electronic tagging experiments , 2007, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[58]  Toby A Patterson,et al.  Classifying movement behaviour in relation to environmental conditions using hidden Markov models. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[59]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Flexible and practical modeling of animal telemetry data: hidden Markov models and extensions. , 2012, Ecology.

[60]  Vardis Tsontos,et al.  Using movement data from electronic tags in fisheries stock assessment: A review of models, technology and experimental design , 2015 .

[61]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  Habitat preference, accessibility, and competition limit the global distribution of breeding Black-browed Albatrosses , 2011 .

[62]  C. Embling,et al.  Navigating uncertain waters: a critical review of inferring foraging behaviour from location and dive data in pinnipeds , 2016, Movement Ecology.