Six Sigma Quality Approach to Robust Optimization

In electromagnetic design, uncertainties in design variables are inevitable, thus in addition to pursuing the theoretical optimum of the objective function the evaluation of robustness of the optimum solution is also critical. Several methodologies exist to tackle robust optimization, such as worst case optimization and gradient index; this paper investigates the use of standard deviation and mean value of objective function under uncertainty of variables. A modified Kriging model with the ability of balancing exploration and exploitation is employed to facilitate the objective function prediction. Two TEAM benchmark problems are solved using different methodologies to compare the advantages and disadvantages of different robust optimization approaches.

[1]  Minh-Trien Pham,et al.  A Robust Global Optimization Algorithm of Electromagnetic Devices Utilizing Gradient Index and Multi-Objective Optimization Method , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[3]  G.L. Soares,et al.  Robust Multi-Objective TEAM 22 Problem: A Case Study of Uncertainties in Design Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[4]  Minh-Trien Pham,et al.  Robust Global Optimization of Electromagnetic Devices With Uncertain Design Parameters: Comparison of the Worst Case Optimization Methods and Multiobjective Optimization Approach Using Gradient Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[5]  Alessandro Formisano,et al.  Tolerance Analysis of NMR Magnets , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[7]  Jan K. Sykulski,et al.  Adaptive Weighted Expected Improvement With Rewards Approach in Kriging Assisted Electromagnetic Design , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[8]  Shiyou Yang,et al.  An improved Tabu search for the global optimizations of electromagnetic devices , 2001 .

[9]  G. Spagnuolo,et al.  Robust Design of Electromagnetic Systems Based on Interval Taylor Extension Applied to a Multiquadric Performance Function , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[10]  S. Brisset,et al.  A new tabu search method for optimization with continuous parameters , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[11]  Shiyou Yang,et al.  An improved population-based incremental learning method for inverse problems , 2008, 2008 World Automation Congress.

[12]  Jan K. Sykulski,et al.  Considerations of uncertainty in robust optimisation of electromagnetic devices , 2014 .

[13]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[14]  N. Hu Tabu search method with random moves for globally optimal design , 1992 .

[15]  Piergiorgio Alotto,et al.  Robust target functions in electromagnetic design , 2003 .

[16]  G. Lei,et al.  Robust Design Optimization of PM-SMC Motors for Six Sigma Quality Manufacturing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  C. Magele,et al.  Managing uncertainties in electromagnetic design problems with robust optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[18]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[19]  Akira Oyama,et al.  A new efficient and useful robust optimization approach - design for multi-objective six sigma , 2005, 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[20]  Jan K. Sykulski,et al.  Robust Global Optimization of Electromagnetic Designs Utilizing Gradient Indices and Kriging , 2013 .