Response Mode Effects and Moral Values

In five studies, we measured the extent to which subjects weight moral product attributes in different response modes. We found that nonprice judgments such as likelihood of purchase ratings were more reflective of expressed moral attitudes than were pricing responses, and that holistic price evaluations were especially unlikely to reflect moral considerations. Post-task ratings confirmed the preference results, as did an experiment controlling for the influence of task goals. Our results have implications for compatibility theories of preference elicitation, the predictability of respondent ratings of attribute unacceptability, and the measurement of utilities for morally charged attributes. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

[1]  R. Gregory Commentary on “Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code” by Payne, Bettman and Schkade , 1999 .

[2]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Goal-Based Construction of Preferences: Task Goals and the Prominence Effect , 1999 .

[3]  J. Baron Utility Maximization as a Solution , 1999 .

[4]  J. Irwin Introduction to the Special Issue on Ethical Trade-Offs in Consumer Decision Making , 1999 .

[5]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[6]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[7]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[8]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  J. Baron Biases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions , 1997 .

[10]  J. Baron,et al.  Cost of Public Goods Affects Willingness to Pay for Them , 1996 .

[11]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. , 1996 .

[12]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[13]  J. Carroll,et al.  Guest Editorial: Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part I, Conjoint Analysis , 1995 .

[14]  J. Douglas Carroll,et al.  Psychometric Methods in Marketing Research: Part I, Conjoint Analysis , 1995 .

[15]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Preference Reversals in Monetary and Life Expectancy Evaluations , 1995 .

[16]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. , 1993 .

[17]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values , 1993 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. , 1990 .

[19]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[21]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. , 1987 .

[22]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[23]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[24]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .