Recommendations for the collection, analysis, and synthesis offurther economic data to support informed decision-makingregarding the Lower Churchill River Hydroelectric Project

In 2009, the Environmental Policy Unit coordinated a joint response from faculty and staff at Memorial University to Nalcor Energy's Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for its proposed 3,074 MW Lower Churchill Hydroelectric Generation Project in Labrador. The response questioned the assumptions underlying the report's opaque use of the precautionary principle and sustainable development. It also critically examined the approach taken to account for greenhouse gas projections and the need for future hydroelectric capacity. Complicating factors in the EIS were the lack of adequate consultation measures with Aboriginal groups, as well as the lack of transparency in that key documents were unavailable to the public. Lastly, the response was critical of how cumulative effects were determined. Key questions to be answered in relation to these concerns were also included.

[1]  Lorne A. Greig,et al.  Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: Improving explorations of the future , 2007 .

[2]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature , 2002, Science.

[3]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  The aggregation of environmental benefit values: Welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP , 2006 .

[4]  F. Gale,et al.  Accounting for Social Impacts and Costs in the Forest Industry, British Columbia , 2006 .

[5]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  The intrinsic difficulty of predicting impacts: Lessons from the James Bay hydro project☆ , 1988 .

[6]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Research Needs , 2006, Science.

[7]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  THE VALUE OF GOOD QUALITY DRINKING WATER TO CANADIANS AND THE ROLE OF RISK PERCEPTIONS: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[8]  A. Troy,et al.  Linking Ecology and Economics for Ecosystem Management , 2006 .

[9]  P. Fearnside,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Brazil's Tucuruí Dam: Unlearned Lessons for Hydroelectric Development in Amazonia , 2001, Environmental management.

[10]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[11]  G. Concu,et al.  Investigating Distance Effects on Environmental Values: A Choice Modelling Approach , 2007 .

[12]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  Report of the NOOA Panel on Contingent Valuation , 1993 .

[13]  R. D. de Groot,et al.  Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  Matthias Schneider,et al.  Green hydropower: a new assessment procedure for river management , 2004 .

[15]  J. R. DeShazo,et al.  Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency , 2002 .

[16]  M. Walpole,et al.  The economics of biodiversity loss: Scoping the science , 2008 .

[17]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[18]  K. Arrow,et al.  Is There a Role for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation? , 1996, Science.