Rheumatoid arthritis of the hand and wrist: comparison of three imaging techniques.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the relative results from conventional high-field-strength 1.5-T MRI, 0.2-T low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and radiography to detect and grade bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Eighteen patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent conventional high-field-strength MRI, low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and conventional radiography of both hands and wrists. Two independent reviewers searched for the presence and extent of bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis. Bone erosions (E scores) and joint-space narrowing (J scores) were evaluated at 14 and 13 sites, respectively, on conventional high-field-strength MRI, low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, and radiography, using the Sharp-Genant scoring system. Synovitis (S scores) were evaluated at 13 sites on conventional high-field-strength MRI and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI. RESULTS For the detection of bone erosions, we found no significant difference (p = 0.71) between conventional high-field-strength MRI (mean +/- SD E score, 27.5 +/- 9.8) and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI (28.8 +/- 10.0), but a significant difference (p < 0.001) appeared between MRI and radiography (13.1 +/- 8.3). J scores derived from MRI (conventional high-field-strength MRI, 15.2 +/- 8.3; low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI, 14.5 +/- 10.4) were higher than those derived from radiography (12.7 +/- 9.6), although the difference was not significant (p = 0.70). Conventional high-field-strength MRI (S score, 35.1 +/- 8.6) and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI (30.8 +/- 10.2) were equivalent (p = 0.14) for the evaluation of synovitis. The interobserver agreement for MRI scores was good to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.83-0.94). CONCLUSION Conventional high-field-strength MRI and low-field-strength dedicated extremity MRI showed similar results in terms of cross-sectional grading of bone erosions, joint-space narrowing, and synovitis in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

[1]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Low field dedicated magnetic resonance imaging in untreated rheumatoid arthritis of recent onset , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  P. Emery,et al.  Early rheumatoid arthritis: therapeutic strategies. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[4]  H K Genant,et al.  Reproducibility of multiple-observer scoring of radiologic abnormalities in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  W. Vennart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of rheumatoid arthritis in metacarpophalangeal joints , 2000, Skeletal Radiology.

[6]  Peterfy,et al.  Dedicated extremity MR imaging: An emerging technology , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[7]  S. Gabriel,et al.  The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[8]  H K Genant,et al.  Assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using a modified scoring method on digitized and original radiographs. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  G. Alarcón,et al.  MR imaging of the hands in early rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  Henrik S. Thomsen,et al.  MRI of the wrist and finger joints in inflammatory joint diseases at 1-year interval: MRI features to predict bone erosions , 2002, European Radiology.

[11]  Henrik S. Thomsen,et al.  MRI of the arthritic small joints: comparison of extremity MRI (0.2 T) vs high-field MRI (1.5 T) , 2001, European Radiology.

[12]  R N Maini,et al.  Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. K. Lee,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in defining remission of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  H K Genant,et al.  How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis? , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  N Stewart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[16]  D Loreck,et al.  Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints , 2002, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[17]  H. Sugimoto,et al.  Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging: quantification of pannus volume in the hands. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[18]  H. Genant.  Methods of assessing radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1983, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  H. Sugimoto,et al.  Early-stage rheumatoid arthritis: prospective study of the effectiveness of MR imaging for diagnosis. , 2000, Radiology.

[20]  A. van der Heide,et al.  The Effectiveness of Early Treatment with Second-Line Antirheumatic Drugs , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  F. McQueen,et al.  A 1-year follow-up study of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals synovitis to be increased in shared epitope-positive patients and predictive of erosions at 1 year. , 2000, Rheumatology.

[22]  Loring T. Swaim.  THE AMERICAN RHEUMATISM ASSOCIATION , 1938 .

[23]  D. Scott,et al.  Long term progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1986, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  S. Gabriel,et al.  The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis in Rochester, Minnesota, 1955-1985. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[25]  M. Østergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis , 2000, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[26]  C N Chen,et al.  The field dependence of NMR imaging. II. Arguments concerning an optimal field strength , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  J Hoenninger,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging: effects of magnetic field strength. , 1984, Radiology.

[28]  H. Sugimoto,et al.  Early-stage rheumatoid arthritis: diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[29]  D Loreck,et al.  Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[30]  O. Henriksen,et al.  Scoring of synovial membrane hypertrophy and bone erosions by MR imaging in clinically active and inactive rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[31]  A. Larsen,et al.  Radiographic Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Related Conditions by Standard Reference Films , 1977, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[32]  J. Stack,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis--a comparison with plain film radiographs. , 1991, British journal of rheumatology.

[33]  M Ostergaard,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[34]  M. Zanetti,et al.  MRI of the foot and ankle: Diagnostic performance and patient acceptance of a dedicated low field MR scanner , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  F. McQueen,et al.  What is the fate of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? Tracking individual lesions using x rays and magnetic resonance imaging over the first two years of disease. , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[36]  F. McQueen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement , 1999, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[37]  Michael J. Green,et al.  The relationship between synovitis and bone changes in early untreated rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[38]  H. Genant,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: summary of OMERACT activities, current status, and plans. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.