How Efficient are Agitators in Biogas Digesters? Determination of the Efficiency of Submersible Motor Mixers and Incline Agitators by Measuring Nutrient Distribution in Full-Scale Agricultural Biogas Digesters

The goal of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of two different agitation systems by measuring the nutrient distribution in a digester fed with renewable energy crops and animal manure. The study was carried out at the practical research biogas plant of Hohenheim University. A unique probe sampling system has been developed that allows probe sampling from the top of the concrete roof into different parts and heights of the digester. The samples were then analyzed in the laboratory for natural fatty acids concentrations. Three different agitation setups were chosen for evaluation at continuous stirring and feeding procedures. The results showed that the analysis approach for agitator optimization through direct measurement of the nutrients distribution in the digester is promising. The type of the agitators and the agitation regime showed significant differences on local concentrations of organic acids, which are not correlated to the dry matter content. Simultaneous measurements on electric energy consumption of the different agitator types verify that by using the slow-moving incline agitator with large propeller diameters in favor of the fast-moving submersible mixer with smaller propeller diameters, the savings potential rises up to 70% by maintaining the mixing quality.

[1]  Mehul Vesvikar,et al.  Flow pattern visualization of a simulated digester. , 2004, Water research.

[2]  Hans Oechsner,et al.  Influence of maintenance intervals on performance and emissions of a 192 kWel biogas Gas Otto CHP unit and results of lubricating oil quality tests - outcome from a continuous two-year measuring campaign. , 2013 .

[3]  C. Maier,et al.  Development of Agitation Systems in Biogas Plants: Investigation of Mixing Characteristics, Improvement of Energy Efficiency and Scale-up Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. , 2010 .

[4]  M. Kraume,et al.  Einfluss der Rheologie auf das Strömungsregime in gerührten großtechnischen Biogasreaktoren , 2012 .

[5]  D. A. Stafford The effects of mixing and volatile fatty acid concentrations on anaerobic digester performance , 1982 .

[6]  G. Dachs,et al.  Der Eigenstromverbrauch von Biogasanlagen und Potenziale zu dessen Reduzierung , 2006 .

[7]  Muthanna Al-Dahhan,et al.  Flow pattern visualization in a mimic anaerobic digester using CFD. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  J. Stephenson,et al.  MIXING EFFICIENCIES IN FULL-SCALE ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS BY TRACER METHODS , 1978 .

[9]  G. A. Ratcliff Unit operations of chemical engineering. : McGraw-Hill, New York, 1956. 956 pp. 79s. , 1957 .

[10]  Christian Maier,et al.  Development of Agitation Systems in Biogas Plants: Investigation of Mixing Characteristics, Improvement of Energy Efficiency and Scale-up using CFD , 2010 .

[11]  Y. R. Chen Rheological properties of sieved beef-cattle manure slurry: Rheological model and effects of temperature and solids concentration , 1986 .

[12]  B. Wu CFD Prediction of Mixing Time in Anaerobic Digesters , 2010 .

[13]  Sebastian Reinecke,et al.  Flow following sensor particles—Validation and macro-mixing analysis in a stirred fermentation vessel with a highly viscous substrate , 2012 .

[14]  Robert Kjellstrand,et al.  Hydraulic Behaviour in an Activated Sludge Tank : From Tracer Test through Hydraulic Modelling to Full-Scale Implementation , 2006 .

[15]  Hans Oechsner,et al.  Electric Energy Consumption of the Full Scale Research Biogas Plant “Unterer Lindenhof”: Results of Longterm and Full Detail Measurements , 2012 .

[16]  M H Al-Dahhan,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: waste strength versus impact of mixing. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[17]  H. Oechsner,et al.  Forschungsbiogasanlage „Unterer Lindenhof" , 2008 .

[18]  L. T. Angenent,et al.  Effect of shear on performance and microbial ecology of continuously stirred anaerobic digesters treating animal manure , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  Binxin Wu,et al.  CFD simulation of non‐Newtonian fluid flow in anaerobic digesters , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  Lars Ellegaard,et al.  Effects of mixing on methane production during thermophilic anaerobic digestion of manure: lab-scale and pilot-scale studies. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[21]  K. McMahon,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--I. Digester performance. , 2001, Water research.

[22]  H. Landry,et al.  PHYSICAL AND RHEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF MANURE PRODUCTS , 2004 .