Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE We compared fulvestrant 500 mg regimen with the approved dose of fulvestrant 250 mg per month for treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who experienced progression after prior endocrine therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) is a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, phase III study. Patients were randomly assigned to fulvestrant 500 mg (500 mg intramuscularly [IM] on day 0, then 500 mg IM on days 14 and 28 and every 28 days thereafter) or 250 mg every 28 days. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS PFS was significantly longer for fulvestrant 500 mg (n = 362) than 250 mg (n = 374) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.94; P = .006), corresponding to a 20% reduction in risk of progression. Objective response rate was similar for fulvestrant 500 mg and 250 mg (9.1% v 10.2%, respectively). CBR was 45.6% for fulvestrant 500 mg and 39.6% for fulvestrant 250 mg. DoCB and OS were 16.6 and 25.1 months, respectively, for the 500-mg group, whereas DoCB and OS were 13.9 and 22.8 months, respectively, in the 250-mg group. Fulvestrant 500 mg was well tolerated with no dose-dependent adverse events. QOL was similar for both arms. CONCLUSION Fulvestrant 500 mg was associated with a statistically significant increase in PFS and not associated with increased toxicity, corresponding to a clinically meaningful improvement in benefit versus risk compared with fulvestrant 250 mg.

[1]  Chia-Jung Lu,et al.  Development of a Novel , 2011 .

[2]  D. Jeffe,et al.  A randomized phase 2 trial of low dose (6 mg daily) versus high dose (30 mg daily) estradiol for patients with estrogen receptor positive aromatase inhibitor resistant advanced breast cancer. , 2009 .

[3]  V. Jordan The 38th David A. Karnofsky lecture: the paradoxical actions of estrogen in breast cancer--survival or death? , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  N. Harbeck,et al.  NEWEST: a Phase II, randomised, neoadjuvant trial comparing fulvestrant 500 mg vs 250 mg in postmenopausal women with locally advanced, oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer , 2008 .

[5]  P. Lønning,et al.  High-dose estrogen treatment in postmenopausal breast cancer patients heavily exposed to endocrine therapy , 2001, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[6]  L. Hartmann,et al.  Randomized trial of diethylstilbestrol vs. tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. An updated analysis , 1999, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  Hong Liu,et al.  Paradoxical action of fulvestrant in estradiol-induced regression of tamoxifen-stimulated breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  M. Ellis,et al.  Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women , 2003, Cancer.

[9]  Gottfried Konecny,et al.  Quantitative association between HER-2/neu and steroid hormone receptors in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  A. Howell,et al.  Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  C K Osborne,et al.  Double-blind, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: results of a North American trial. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Comparison of the short-term biological effects of 7alpha-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulfinyl)-nonyl]estra-1,3,5, (10)-triene-3,17beta-diol (Faslodex) versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. , 2001, Cancer research.

[13]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[14]  A. Howell,et al.  ICI 182,780 (Faslodex™) , 2000, Cancer.

[15]  A. Howell,et al.  Investigation of a new pure antiestrogen (ICI 182780) in women with primary breast cancer. , 1994, Cancer research.

[16]  A. Wakeling,et al.  A potent specific pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. , 1991, Cancer research.