Interlaboratory evaluation of a flow cytometric, high content in vitro micronucleus assay.

An international, multi-lab trial was conducted to evaluate a flow cytometry-based method for scoring micronuclei in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells [S.L. Avlasevich, S.M. Bryce, S.E. Cairns, S.D. Dertinger, In vitro micronucleus scoring by flow cytometry: differential staining of micronuclei versus apoptotic and necrotic chromatin enhances assay reliability, Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 47 (2006) 56-66]. A reference laboratory investigated the potential of six chemicals to induce micronuclei -- the genotoxicants mitomycin C (MMC), etoposide (ETOPO), and vinblastine (VB), and the non-genotoxicants sucrose (SUC), staurosporine (STS), and dexamethasone (DEX). The latter two non-genotoxicants were selected as extreme challenges to the assay because of their potent apoptogenic activity. Three collaborating laboratories were supplied with prototype In Vitro MicroFlow kits, and each was assigned one genotoxicant and one non-genotoxicant. Cells were treated continuously for 24h over a range of concentrations up to 5 mg/ml, or overtly cytotoxic concentrations. Micronuclei were scored via standard microscopy and flow cytometry. In addition to enumerating micronucleus frequencies, a cytotoxicity measurement that is simultaneously acquired with the flow cytometric micronucleus scoring procedure was evaluated (Flow-NBR). With this method, latex particles served as counting beads, and facilitated relative survival measurements that exclude the presence of dead/dying cells. For comparison purposes, additional cytotoxicity endpoints were measured, including several that are based on cell number, and others that reflect compromised membrane integrity, including dye permeability and/or phospholipid distribution. Key findings for this set of compounds include the following: (1) significant discrepancies in top concentration selection were found when cytotoxicity measurements were based on different methods, with the Flow-NBR approach tending to be the most sensitive, (2) both microscopy- and flow cytometry-based scoring methods detected concentration-dependent micronucleus formation for the three genotoxic agents studied, with good agreement between the reference laboratory and the collaborating laboratories, and (3) whereas flow cytometric analyses showed no significant increases for the non-genotoxicants when top concentration selection was based on Flow-NBR, significantly elevated micronucleus frequencies were observed for concentrations that were chosen based on less-sensitive cytotoxicity assays. Collectively, these results indicate that rapid assessment of genotoxicity can be accomplished with a relatively simple flow cytometric technique, and that the scoring system is transferable across laboratories. Furthermore, a concurrent assessment of cytotoxicity, Flow-NBR, may help reduce the occurrence of irrelevant positive results, as it may represent a more appropriate means for choosing top concentration levels. Finally, the data presented herein reinforce concerns about the manner in which cytotoxicity limits are described in guidance documents, since these recommendations tend to cite fixed cut-off values without reference to methodology.

[1]  T. Sofuni,et al.  Evaluation of the micronucleus test using a Chinese hamster cell line as an alternative to the conventional in vitro chromosomal aberration test. , 1992, Mutation research.

[2]  M. Bauchinger,et al.  Multiparametric flow cytometric analysis of radiation-induced micronuclei in mammalian cell cultures. , 1992, Cytometry.

[3]  S. Galloway.  Cytotoxicity and chromosome aberrations in vitro: Experience in industry and the case for an upper limit on toxicity in the aberration assay , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[4]  A. Lynch,et al.  Evaluation of the Litron In Vitro MicroFlow Kit for the flow cytometric enumeration of micronuclei (MN) in mammalian cells. , 2008, Mutation research.

[5]  S. K. Greenwood,et al.  Chromosome aberrations in vitro related to cytotoxicity of nonmutagenic chemicals and metabolic poisons , 1998, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[6]  Takayoshi Suzuki,et al.  Genotoxicity of microcystin-LR in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells. , 2004, Mutation research.

[7]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. , 2007, Mutation research.

[8]  M. Fellows,et al.  Cytotoxicity in cultured mammalian cells is a function of the method used to estimate it. , 2007, Mutagenesis.

[9]  M. Nüsse,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis of micronuclei found in cells after irradiation. , 1984, Cytometry.

[10]  M. Nüsse,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis of micronuclei in cell cultures and human lymphocytes: advantages and disadvantages. , 1997, Mutation research.

[11]  V. Mersch-Sundermann,et al.  Use of human-derived liver cell lines for the detection of environmental and dietary genotoxicants; current state of knowledge. , 2004, Toxicology.

[12]  David Kirkland,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo. , 2005, Mutation research.

[13]  Stephen D Dertinger,et al.  In vitro micronucleus scoring by flow cytometry: Differential staining of micronuclei versus apoptotic and necrotic chromatin enhances assay reliability , 2006, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[14]  H. Stopper,et al.  Evaluation of the in vitro micronucleus test as an alternative to the in vitro chromosomal aberration assay: position of the GUM Working Group on the in vitro micronucleus test. Gesellschaft für Umwelt-Mutations-forschung. , 1998, Mutation research.

[15]  W. Hoffman,et al.  A protocol for the in vitro micronucleus test. II. Contributions to the validation of a protocol suitable for regulatory submissions from an examination of 10 chemicals with different mechanisms of action and different levels of activity. , 2002, Mutation research.

[16]  M. Nüsse,et al.  Flow cytometric detection of micronuclei by combined staining of DNA and membranes. , 1995, Cytometry.

[17]  Daniel Marzin,et al.  Using CTLL‐2 and CTLL‐2 bcl2 cells to avoid interference by apoptosis in the in vitro micronucleus test , 2003, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[18]  W. Hoffman,et al.  A protocol for the in vitro micronucleus test. I. Contributions to the development of a protocol suitable for regulatory submissions from an examination of 16 chemicals with different mechanisms of action and different levels of activity. , 2002, Mutation research.

[19]  H. Braselmann,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis of micronuclei in the CD2+/- subpopulation of human lymphocytes enriched by magnetic separation. , 1995, International journal of radiation biology.

[20]  Lutz Müller,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. , 2005, Mutation research.

[21]  M. Fenech,et al.  HUMN project: detailed description of the scoring criteria for the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay using isolated human lymphocyte cultures. , 2003, Mutation research.

[22]  Richard M Walmsley,et al.  High-specificity and high-sensitivity genotoxicity assessment in a human cell line: validation of the GreenScreen HC GADD45a-GFP genotoxicity assay. , 2006, Mutation research.

[23]  M. Pallardy,et al.  Apoptosis can be a confusing factor in in vitro clastogenic assays. , 2001, Mutagenesis.

[24]  Sheila M Galloway,et al.  Population doubling: A simple and more accurate estimation of cell growth suppression in the in vitro assay for chromosomal aberrations that reduces irrelevant positive results , 2004, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[25]  Daniel Marzin,et al.  SFTG international collaborative study on in vitro micronucleus test I. General conditions and overall conclusions of the study. , 2006, Mutation research.

[26]  S. McKiernan,et al.  In vitro micronucleus assay with Chinese hamster V79 cells - results of a collaborative study with in situ exposure to 26 chemical substances. , 2000, Mutation research.

[27]  T. Sofuni,et al.  Validation study of the in vitro micronucleus test in a Chinese hamster lung cell line (CHL/IU). , 1999, Mutagenesis.

[28]  Stephen D Dertinger,et al.  In vitro micronucleus assay scored by flow cytometry provides a comprehensive evaluation of cytogenetic damage and cytotoxicity. , 2007, Mutation research.

[29]  Véronique Gervais,et al.  Genetic toxicity assessment: employing the best science for human safety evaluation. Part II: Performances of the in vitro micronucleus test compared to the mouse lymphoma assay and the in vitro chromosome aberration assay. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[30]  T Sofuni,et al.  Report from the In Vitro Micronucleus Assay Working Group. , 2003, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.