Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is known to reveal breast cancer with higher sensitivity than mammography alone. The specificity is, however, compromised by the observation that several benign masses take up contrast agent in addition to malignant lesions. The aim of this study is to increase the objectivity of breast cancer diagnosis in contrast-enhanced MRI by developing automated methods for computer-aided diagnosis. Our database consists of 27 MR studies from 27 patients. In each study, at least four MR series of both breasts are obtained using FLASH three-dimensional (3D) acquisition at 90 s time intervals after injection of Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) contrast agent. Each series consists of 64 coronal slices with a typical thickness of 2 mm, and a pixel size of 1.25 mm. The study contains 13 benign and 15 malignant lesions from which features are automatically extracted in 3D. These features include margin descriptors and radial gradient analysis as a function of time and space. Stepwise multiple regression is employed to obtain an effective subset of combined features. A final estimate of likelihood of malignancy is determined by linear discriminant analysis, and the performance of classification by round-robin testing and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. To assess the efficacy of 3D analysis, the study is repeated in two-dimensions (2D) using a representative slice through the middle of the lesion. In 2D and in 3D, radial gradient analysis and analysis of margin sharpness were found to be an effective combination to distinguish between benign and malignant masses (resulting area under the ROC curve: 0.96). Feature analysis in 3D was found to result in higher performance of lesion characterization than 2D feature analysis for the majority of single and combined features. In conclusion, automated feature extraction and classification has the potential to complement the interpretation of radiologists in an objective, consistent, and accurate way.

[1]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[2]  A Horsman,et al.  Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  S E Harms,et al.  MRI in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. , 1996, Current problems in diagnostic radiology.

[4]  M D Schnall,et al.  Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  K Doi,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[6]  U Sinha,et al.  Segmentation strategies for breast tumors from dynamic MR images , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  J R Brookeman,et al.  Breast lesion discrimination using statistical analysis and shape measures on magnetic resonance imagery. , 1991, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[8]  Gail Gong.  Cross-Validation, the Jackknife, and the Bootstrap: Excess Error Estimation in Forward Logistic Regression , 1986 .

[9]  A Heinig,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. , 1997, European journal of radiology.

[10]  M. Giger,et al.  Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. , 1996, Radiology.

[11]  H Requardt,et al.  Prototype Breast Coil for MR‐Guided Needle Localization , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  F. Kelcz,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced breast MRI. , 1995, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[14]  C. Metz,et al.  A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. , 1996, Radiology.

[15]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[16]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[17]  M. Giger,et al.  Analysis of spiculation in the computerized classification of mammographic masses. , 1995, Medical physics.

[18]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[19]  P S Tofts,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  M D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. , 1994, Radiology.

[21]  M Giger,et al.  Image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. , 1996, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[22]  D Revel,et al.  Gd-DTPA contrast enhancement and tissue differentiation in MR imaging of experimental breast carcinoma. , 1986, Radiology.

[23]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[24]  L J van Erning,et al.  MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. , 1994, Radiology.