Does Size Really Matter? How Quality Should be Analyzed for the Acquisition Workforce

Abstract : The original purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the success of the acquisition workforce initiative in expanding and improving the quality of the acquisition workforce. Unfortunately, due to lack of data and no clear definition of quality within the acquisitions community, this was not possible. Instead, this study examines and critiques previous notions of workforce quality in the context of government employment. We offer a preliminary framework with which to build and assess workforce quality in the future. We discuss methods used, identify insufficiencies, and provide suggestions for measurement and program evaluation. Furthermore, we provide a conceptual framework behind a generally accepted definition of quality based on the human capital literature and provide recommendations for data collection in order to conduct valid evaluations of the success \201or failure\202 of the Acquisition Workforce Initiative going forward.

[1]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[2]  R. Ployhart.  Personnel Selection: Ensuring Sustainable Organizational Effectiveness Through the Acquisition of Human Capital , 2012 .

[3]  Edward G. Keating,et al.  The Defense Acquisition Workforce , 2008 .

[4]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2000 .

[5]  Gerald V. Barrett,et al.  Validity of Personnel Decisions: A Conceptual Analysis of the Inferential and Evidential Bases , 1989 .

[6]  Steffanie L. Wilk,et al.  Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[7]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  SOCIALIZATION TACTICS AND PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT , 2001 .

[8]  P. Muchinsky,et al.  What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit , 1987 .

[9]  Timothy Reed.  Army Contracting Command Workforce Model Analysis , 2010 .

[10]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[11]  J. Hunter,et al.  Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance , 1984 .

[12]  Robert J. Harvey,et al.  Yes Virginia, thereis an objective reality in job analysis , 2000 .

[13]  R. Dawis,et al.  A psychological theory of work adjustment : an individual-differences model and its applications , 1984 .

[14]  Beth J. Asch.  The Pay, Promotion, and Retention of High-Quality Civil Service Workers in the Department of Defense , 2001 .

[15]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Teacher salaries and teacher quality , 1997 .

[16]  Michael A. Curme,et al.  Worker quality and labor market sorting , 2007 .

[17]  J. Edwards,et al.  Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Aging, Adult Development, and Work Motivation , 2004 .

[19]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The Meaning for Personnel Selection Research , 1997 .

[20]  J. Mincer.  Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution , 1958, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Brendan Hogan,et al.  Shaping the Navy's Acquisition Workforce , 2012 .

[22]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  The Power of Incentives , 2000 .