The phase analysis of ongoing EEG oscillations under face/object perception

Event-related potentials (ERPs) analysis has been widely used in the cognitive studies due to its good performance in reflecting the time-locked stimulus-related brain activities. However, recent studies have found that the phase coherence of ongoing EEG oscillations is also related to stimulus-related brain activities and could reveal some information (e.g. phase-locked modulation in time-frequency domain) that ERPs could not provide. Here, we used inter-trail phase coherence(ITPC) to analyze the ongoing EEG oscillations under face/object stimuli, which aimed to explore the influence of face/object stimuli on EEG oscillations at various frequency bands (alpha, beta and low frequency gamma). Our preliminary results showed that (1) alpha band has relatively high phase synchronization in the time window of P1-N170-P2 under face/object stimuli; (2) EEG for face stimuli showed higher phase synchronization than object did in the time window of 80–350 ms in alpha band; (3) in low frequency gamma band, faces evoked relatively higher phase synchronization around 170ms than objects did. These results indicated that (1) ITPC, the measure of EEG phase synchronization, could be effectively used in face/object perception to provide oscillatory phase information; (2) the modulation of ITPC value in the alpha band might be more suitable to investigate the face preference EEG activities and locate the time range of the early face perception compared with ERPs; (3) the difference between face and object processing could be reflected in the low frequency gamma band via ITPC values.

[1]  B. Jansen,et al.  Phase synchronization of the ongoing EEG and auditory EP generation , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials , 1999 .

[3]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  R. Barry.  Evoked activity and EEG phase resetting in the genesis of auditory Go/NoGo ERPs , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[6]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Single-trial EEG dynamics of object and face visual processing , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  From single-trial EEG to brain area dynamics , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[8]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Tal Golan,et al.  Human face preference in gamma-frequency EEG activity , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Detection of synchronized oscillations in the electroencephalogram: an evaluation of methods. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[11]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  The many faces of the gamma band response to complex visual stimuli , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  Wenfeng Feng,et al.  Three stages of facial expression processing: ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Synchronized oscillations during cooperative feature linking in a cortical model of visual perception , 1991, Neural Networks.

[16]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception , 2010 .

[17]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[18]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Engel,et al.  Single-trial EEG–fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.