Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse.

The impact factor was created in the biomedical research field in order to measure a journal's value by calculating the average number of citations per article over a period of time. It was initially developed to help libraries decide which highly-cited journals to subscribe to. However, at present, it is being misused to judge the quality of a researcher or medical scientist as well as the quality of the work done. It contains serious sources of errors and flaws, resulting in strong biases against culture- and language-bound medical subspecialties. The present article is aimed to highlight the impact of the impact factor in the biomedical research, as well as its use and misuse.

[1]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[2]  Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al.  English versus Spanish in science evaluation , 1999, Nature.

[3]  EUGENE,et al.  Uses and Misuses of Citation Frequency , 1985 .

[4]  N. Mohaghegh,et al.  WHY THE IMPACT FACTOR OF JOURNALS SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR EVALUATING RESEARCH , 2005 .

[5]  E. Garfield.  Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? , 1996 .

[6]  E. Brähler,et al.  »Das Wahre, Schöne, Gute oder schöne, gute Ware?« Wenn die Ladung verschwindet – Wissenschaft als Ware , 2001 .

[7]  Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al.  Some Misuses of Journal Impact Factor in Research Evaluation , 2001, Cortex.

[8]  Manfred E. Beutel,et al.  Deep impact – evaluation in the sciences , 2003, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin.

[9]  P M Linardi,et al.  The "impact factor" as a criterion for the quality of scientific production is a relative, not absolute, measure. , 1996, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[10]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  Jonathan Adams.  Benchmarking international research , 1998, Nature.

[12]  P M Z Coelho,et al.  The use and misuse of the "impact factor" as a parameter for evaluation of scientific publication quality: a proposal to rationalize its application. , 2003, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[13]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[14]  M. Pfeifer,et al.  The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. , 1990, JAMA.

[15]  Richard M. Smith,et al.  Commentary: the power of the unrelenting impact factor--is it a force for good or harm? , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  David Adam,et al.  Citation analysis: The counting house , 2002, Nature.

[17]  Qais Al-Awqati.  Impact factors and prestige. , 2007, Kidney international.

[18]  E Frömter,et al.  [The AWMF model for the evaluation of published research papers in medicine. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der wissenschaftlichen medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (Working Group of the Scientific Medical Specialty Societies)]. , 1999, Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.

[19]  Mary E. Gabehart.  An analysis of citations to retracted articles in the scientific literature , 2005 .