Prospective Evaluation of a Breast Cancer Risk Model Integrating Classical Risk Factors and Polygenic Risk in 15 Cohorts from Six Countries

Risk-stratified breast cancer prevention requires accurate identification of women at sufficiently different levels of risk. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of a model integrating classical risk factors and a recently developed 313-variant polygenic risk score (PRS) to predict breast cancer risk.Fifteen prospective cohorts from six countries with 237,632 women (7,529 incident breast cancer patients) of European ancestry aged 19-75 years at baseline were included. Calibration of five-year risk was assessed by comparing predicted and observed proportions of cases overall and within risk categories. Risk stratification for women of European ancestry aged 50-70 years in those countries was evaluated by the proportion of women and future breast cancer cases crossing clinically-relevant risk thresholds.The model integrating classical risk factors and PRS accurately predicted five-year risk. For women younger than 50 years, median (range) expected-to-observed ratio across the cohorts was 0.94 (0.72 to 1.01) overall and 0.9 (0.7 to 1.4) at the highest risk decile. For women 50 years or older, these ratios were 1.04 (0.73 to 1.31) and 1.2 (0.7 to 1.6), respectively. The proportion of women in the general population identified above the 3% five-year risk threshold (used for recommending risk-reducing medications in the US) ranged from 7.0% in Germany (∼841,000 of 12 million) to 17.7% in the US (∼5.3 of 30 million). At this threshold, 14.7% of US women were re-classified by the addition of PRS to classical risk factors, identifying 12.2% additional future breast cancer cases.Evaluation across multiple prospective cohorts demonstrates that integrating a 313-SNP PRS into a risk model substantially improves its ability to stratify women of European ancestry for applying current breast cancer prevention guidelines.

[1]  Nilanjan Chatterjee,et al.  iCARE: An R package to build, validate and apply absolute risk models , 2020, PloS one.

[2]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Medication Use to Reduce Risk of Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. , 2019, JAMA.

[3]  M. Somerfield,et al.  Use of Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  X. Castells,et al.  A systematic review and quality assessment of individualised breast cancer risk prediction models , 2019, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  L. Sugrue,et al.  What Are Polygenic Scores and Why Are They Important? , 2019, JAMA.

[6]  S. Astley,et al.  Breast cancer pathology and stage are better predicted by risk stratification models that include mammographic density and common genetic variants , 2019, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  Gord Glendon,et al.  10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  S. Hankinson,et al.  Breast cancer risk prediction in women aged 35–50 years: impact of including sex hormone concentrations in the Gail model , 2019, Breast Cancer Research.

[9]  E. Ziv,et al.  A response to “Personalised medicine and population health: breast and ovarian cancer” , 2019, Human Genetics.

[10]  M. García-Closas,et al.  Assessment of breast cancer risk: which tools to use? , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  M. García-Closas,et al.  Correction: BOADICEA: a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors , 2019, Genetics in Medicine.

[12]  M. García-Closas,et al.  BOADICEA: a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors , 2019, Genetics in Medicine.

[13]  Kristen S Purrington,et al.  Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2018, American Journal of Human Genetics.

[14]  V. Viallon,et al.  Risk prediction for estrogen receptor-specific breast cancers in two large prospective cohorts , 2018, Breast Cancer Research.

[15]  M. García-Closas,et al.  Comparative validation of breast cancer risk prediction models and projections for future risk stratification , 2018, bioRxiv.

[16]  M. Gail,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk Model Requirements for Counseling, Prevention, and Screening , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  E. Topol,et al.  The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  W. Willett,et al.  Addition of a polygenic risk score, mammographic density, and endogenous hormones to existing breast cancer risk prediction models: A nested case–control study , 2018, PLoS medicine.

[19]  P. Pharoah,et al.  Cost-effectiveness and Benefit-to-Harm Ratio of Risk-Stratified Screening for Breast Cancer , 2018, JAMA oncology.

[20]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density , 2018, JAMA oncology.

[21]  S. Astley,et al.  Use of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Mammographic Density Plus Classic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction , 2018, JAMA oncology.

[22]  C. Sotiriou,et al.  Unravelling triple-negative breast cancer molecular heterogeneity using an integrative multiomic analysis , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  S. Cross,et al.  Reproductive profiles and risk of breast cancer subtypes: a multi-center case-only study , 2017, Breast Cancer Research.

[24]  J. Guan,et al.  Breast Cancer: Multiple Subtypes within a Tumor? , 2017, Trends in cancer.

[25]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci , 2017, Nature.

[26]  Jingmei Li,et al.  Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk Factors Reveals Subtype Heterogeneity. , 2017, Cancer research.

[27]  Danielle Braun,et al.  Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications , 2017, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[28]  A. Fournier,et al.  Added Value of Serum Hormone Measurements in Risk Prediction Models for Breast Cancer for Women Not Using Exogenous Hormones: Results from the EPIC Cohort , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  Mitchell H Gail,et al.  Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in US Hispanic Women , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[30]  Martin Eklund,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening in the Precision Medicine Era: Risk-Based Screening in a Population-Based Trial , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  M. García-Closas,et al.  iCARE: R package to build, validate and apply absolute risk models , 2016, bioRxiv.

[32]  W. Willett,et al.  Breast Cancer Risk From Modifiable and Nonmodifiable Risk Factors Among White Women in the United States. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[33]  S. Cummings,et al.  Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[34]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  The contributions of breast density and common genetic variation to breast cancer risk. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[35]  M. García-Closas,et al.  Combined associations of genetic and environmental risk factors: implications for prevention of breast cancer. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[36]  Anne Marie McCarthy,et al.  Incremental impact of breast cancer SNP panel on risk classification in a screening population of white and African American women , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[37]  N. Ascunce,et al.  Recalibration of the Gail model for predicting invasive breast cancer risk in Spanish women: a population-based cohort study , 2013, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[38]  Mitchell H Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in Asian and Pacific Islander American women. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[39]  Victoria L. Cafourek,et al.  Associations of breast cancer risk factors with tumor subtypes: a pooled analysis from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium studies. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[40]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[41]  D Spiegelman,et al.  Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[42]  Mahesh S. Patel An introduction to meta-analysis. , 1989, Health policy.

[43]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .