Understanding An Informed Public's Views On The Role Of Evidence In Making Health Care Decisions.

Policy makers and practitioners increasingly believe that medical evidence plays a critical role in improving care and health outcomes and lowering costs. However, public understanding of the role of evidence-based care may be different. Public deliberation is a process that convenes diverse citizens and has them learn about and consider ethical or values-based dilemmas and weigh alternative views. The Community Forum Deliberative Methods Demonstration project, sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, obtained informed public views on the role of evidence in health care decisions through seventy-six deliberative groups involving 907 people overall, in the period August-November 2012. Although participants perceived evidence as being essential to high-quality care, they also believed that personal choice or clinical judgment could trump evidence. They viewed doctors as central figures in discussing evidence with patients and key arbiters of whether to follow evidence in individual cases. They found evidence of harm to individuals or the community to be more compelling than evidence of effectiveness. These findings indicate that increased public understanding of evidence can play an important role in advancing evidence-based care by helping create policies that better reflect the needs and values of the public.

[1]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  ChoiceDialogues and Deliberative Polls: Two Approaches to Deliberative Democracy , 2004 .

[2]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[3]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. , 2013, Health affairs.

[4]  M. Gold,et al.  Does providing cost-effectiveness information change coverage priorities for citizens acting as social decision makers? , 2007, Health policy.

[5]  R. Mcgee,et al.  Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberation. , 2008, Health policy.

[6]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Bringing values and deliberation to science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  R. Grol,et al.  Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial , 2014, Implementation Science.

[8]  M. Gold,et al.  Deliberation: Obtaining Informed Input from a Diverse Public , 2015, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[9]  J. Eyles,et al.  Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[10]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion , 2005 .

[11]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[12]  Todd R. Davies,et al.  Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial. , 2015, Social science & medicine.

[13]  K. Carman,et al.  Evidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence-based health care. , 2010, Health affairs.

[14]  G. Hughes Evidence-Based Medicine in Health Care Reform , 2011, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[15]  Stephanie Solomon,et al.  Why and when should we use public deliberation? , 2012, The Hastings Center report.

[16]  L. Sandy,et al.  UnitedHealthcare experience illustrates how payers can enable patient engagement. , 2013, Health affairs.

[17]  S. Dentzer,et al.  Rx for the 'blockbuster drug' of patient engagement. , 2013, Health affairs.