The effects of aggregated land cover data on estimating NPP in northern Wisconsin

Ecosystem models are routinely used to estimate net primary production (NPP) from the stand to global scales. Complex ecosystem models, implemented at small scales (<10 km 2 ), are impractical at global scales and, therefore, require simplifying logic based on key ecological first principles and model drivers derived from remotely sensed data. There is a need for an improved understanding of the factors that influence the variability of NPP model estimates at different scales so we can improve the accuracy of NPP estimates at the global scale. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of using leaf area index (LAI) and three different aggregated land cover classification products–two factors derived from remotely sensed data and strongly affect NPP estimates–in a light use efficiency (LUE) model to estimate NPP in a heterogeneous temperate forest landscape in northern Wisconsin, USA. Three separate land cover classifications were derived from three different remote sensors with spatial resolutions of 15, 30, and 1000 m. Average modeled net primary production (NPP) ranged from 402 gC m � 2 year � 1 (15 m data) to 431 gC m � 2 year � 1 (1000 m data), for a maximum difference of 7%. Almost 50% of the difference was attributed each to LAI estimates and land cover classifications between the fine and coarse scale NPP estimate. Results from this study suggest that ecosystem models that use biome-level land cover classifications with associated LUE coefficients may be used to model NPP in heterogeneous land cover areas dominated by cover types with similar NPP. However, more research is needed to examine scaling errors in other heterogeneous areas and NPP errors associated with deriving LAI estimates.

[1]  Mark E. Jakubauskas,et al.  Canonical correlation analysis of coniferous forest spectral and biotic relations , 1996 .

[2]  Steven E. Franklin,et al.  Landsat TM Derived Forest Covertypes for Modelling Net Primary Production , 1997 .

[3]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Rapid Estimation of Leaf Area Index in Conifer and Broad-Leaf Plantations , 1991 .

[4]  B. Medlyn.  Physiological basis of the light use efficiency model. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[5]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  An approach to spatially distributed modeling of net primary production (NPP) at the landscape scale and its application in validation of EOS NPP products , 1999 .

[6]  R. Myneni,et al.  On the relationship between FAPAR and NDVI , 1994 .

[7]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  Land cover mapping, fire regeneration, and scaling studies in the Canadian boreal forest with 1 km AVHRR and Landsat TM data , 1997 .

[8]  M. MacKenzie,et al.  Effects of sensor spatial resolution on landscape structure parameters , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[10]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes , 1996 .

[11]  J. Muller,et al.  Terrestrial remote sensing science and algorithms planned for EOS/MODIS , 1994 .

[12]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Estimating the leaf area index of North Central Wisconsin forests using the landsat thematic mapper , 1997 .

[13]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[14]  S. Gower,et al.  Interrelationships among the edaphic and stand characteristics, leaf area index, and aboveground net primary production of upland forest ecosystems in north central Wisconsin , 1997 .

[15]  A. McGuire,et al.  Effects of spatial aggregation on predictions of forest climate change response , 1999 .

[16]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[17]  S. Running,et al.  8 – Generalization of a Forest Ecosystem Process Model for Other Biomes, BIOME-BGC, and an Application for Global-Scale Models , 1993 .

[18]  Kenneth J. Davis,et al.  The annual cycles of CO2 and H2O exchange over a northern mixed forest as observed from a very tall tower , 2003 .

[19]  Steven W. Running,et al.  The effects of aggregating sub-grid land surface variation on large-scale estimates of net primary production , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[20]  A. Bondeau,et al.  Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results , 1999 .

[21]  K. Hibbard,et al.  A Global Terrestrial Monitoring Network Integrating Tower Fluxes, Flask Sampling, Ecosystem Modeling and EOS Satellite Data , 1999 .

[22]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[23]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Heterogeneity of light use efficiency in a northern Wisconsin forest: implications for modeling net primary production with remote sensing , 2004 .

[24]  Thomas M. Lillesand,et al.  Upper Midwest Gap Analysis Program, Image Processing Protocol , 1998 .

[25]  Anthony W King,et al.  Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  G. Bonan.  Land-Atmosphere interactions for climate system Models: coupling biophysical, biogeochemical, and ecosystem dynamical processes , 1995 .

[27]  D. Turner,et al.  Integrating Remote Sensing and Ecosystem Process Models for Landscape- to Regional-Scale Analysis of the Carbon Cycle , 2004 .

[28]  Paul V. Bolstad,et al.  Coordinating methodologies for scaling landcover classifications from site-specific to global: Steps toward validating global map products , 1999 .

[29]  S. N. Burrows,et al.  Spatial variability of aboveground net primary production for a forested landscape in northern Wisconsin , 2003 .

[30]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Integrating Contextual Information with per-Pixel Classification for Improved Land Cover Classification , 2000 .

[31]  John M. Norman,et al.  Application of Geostatistics to Characterize Leaf Area Index (LAI) from Flux Tower to Landscape Scales Using a Cyclic Sampling Design , 2002, Ecosystems.

[32]  Douglas E. Ahl,et al.  Tree species effects on stand transpiration in northern Wisconsin , 2002 .

[33]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[34]  Warren B. Cohen,et al.  Alternative spatial resolutions and estimation of carbon flux over a managed forest landscape in Western Oregon , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Hong S. He,et al.  Effects of spatial aggregation approaches on classified satellite imagery , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[36]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[37]  David P. Turner,et al.  Comparison of alternative spatial resolutions in the application of a spatially distributed biogeochemical model over complex terrain , 1996 .

[38]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessing forest productivity in Australia and New Zealand using a physiologically-based model driven with averaged monthly weather data and satellite-derived estimates of canopy photosynthetic capacity , 1998 .

[39]  C. Justice,et al.  Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations , 1988 .

[40]  P. Gong,et al.  Remote Sensing of Seasonal Leaf Area Index Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[41]  Warren B. Cohen,et al.  Effects of spatial variability in light use efficiency on satellite-based NPP monitoring , 2002 .

[42]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[43]  Warren B. Cohen,et al.  Multiscale Assessment of Binary and Continuous Landcover Variables for MODIS Validation, Mapping, and Modeling Applications , 1999 .

[44]  G. Mohren,et al.  Applicability of the radiation-use efficiency concept for simulating growth of forest stands , 1997 .

[45]  S. Sader,et al.  Accuracy of landsat-TM and GIS rule-based methods for forest wetland classification in Maine , 1995 .

[46]  C. Field,et al.  Scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. , 1995 .

[47]  Karin S. Fassnacht,et al.  Relationships between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites , 1999 .

[48]  C. Justice,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part II: The Generation of Global Fields of Terrestrial Biophysical Parameters from Satellite Data , 1996 .

[49]  B. Choudhury.  Estimating Gross Photosynthesis Using Satellite and Ancillary Data: Approach and Preliminary Results , 2001 .

[50]  S. Goetz,et al.  Variability in carbon exchange and light utilization among boreal forest stands: implications for remote sensing of net primary production , 1998, Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

[51]  Douglas E. Ahl,et al.  Effects of aggregated classifications of forest composition on estimates of evapotranspiration in a northern Wisconsin forest , 2002 .

[52]  J. Monteith.  SOLAR RADIATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1972 .

[53]  R. J. Birk,et al.  Commercial remote sensing program , 1994 .

[54]  S. Gower,et al.  Applications of physiological ecology to forest management , 1996 .

[55]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[56]  S. Running,et al.  Remote Sensing of Coniferous Forest Leaf Area , 1986 .

[57]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources , 1994 .

[58]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[59]  S. Running,et al.  Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, Biome-BGC, and an application for global-scale models. Scaling processes between leaf and landscape levels , 1993 .

[60]  J. Monteith.  Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .