Mapping the Ultrasound Landscape to Define Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Diagnostic Ultrasound: A White Paper From the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound and ACR Commission on Ultrasound.

Current descriptions of ultrasound evaluations, including use of the term "point-of-care ultrasound" (POCUS), are imprecise because they are predicated on distinctions based on the device used to obtain images, the location where the images were obtained, the provider who obtained the images, or the focus of the examination. This is confusing because it does not account for more meaningful distinctions based on the setting, comprehensiveness, and completeness of the evaluation. In this white paper, the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound and the ACR Commission on Ultrasound articulate a map of the ultrasound landscape that divides sonographic evaluations into four distinct categories on the basis of setting, comprehensiveness, and completeness. Details of this classification scheme are elaborated, including important clarifications regarding what ensures comprehensiveness and completeness. Practical implications of this framework for future research and reimbursement paradigms are highlighted.

[1]  S. Hoffenberg,et al.  Time for the Sonoscope? , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  R. Filly Ultrasound: the stethoscope of the future, alas. , 1988, Radiology.

[3]  B. Hoffmann The Future Is Not the Sonoscope , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[4]  S. Lotfipour,et al.  A prospective evaluation of emergency department bedside ultrasonography for the detection of acute cholecystitis. , 2010, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  Charles M. LoPresti,et al.  Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Hospitalists: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. , 2019, Journal of hospital medicine.

[6]  M. McInnes,et al.  Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research , 2020, JAMA network open.

[7]  Maitray D. Patel,et al.  Likelihood ratio of sonographic findings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  R. Filly,et al.  Is It Time for the Sonoscope? If So, Then Let's Do It Right! , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Time to Add a Fifth Pillar to Bedside Physical Examination: Inspection, Palpation, Percussion, Auscultation, and Insonation , 2018, JAMA cardiology.

[10]  J. Brix,et al.  Is point-of-care ultrasound disruptive innovation? Formulating why POCUS is different from conventional comprehensive ultrasound , 2018, Critical Ultrasound Journal.

[11]  Dana R. Kriesel,et al.  Ultrasonography versus computed tomography for suspected nephrolithiasis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  C. Moore,et al.  Point-of-care ultrasonography. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. Dhillon,et al.  Canadian Association of Radiologists Position Statement on Point-of-Care Ultrasound , 2019, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[14]  T. Mailhot,et al.  Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment, Vitreous Hemorrhage, and Vitreous Detachment in the Emergency Department , 2019, JAMA network open.

[15]  E. Puscheck,et al.  Simple Adnexal Cysts: SRU Consensus Conference Update on Follow-up and Reporting. , 2019, Radiology.

[16]  Lennard D Greenbaum,et al.  It Is Time for the Sonoscope , 2003, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[17]  P. Norman,et al.  Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in Western Australia. , 1992, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.