Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human

Accurate reaching towards a visual target is initially disturbed when the visual field is displaced by prisms, but recovers with successive trials. To determine how the improvement depends on the visual error signals associated with the motor output, the time course of prism adaptation was studied with delayed visual information on the error. Subjects were trained to reach rapidly at a target on a tangent screen. Vision was always blocked during the movement, and allowed again only after the index finger touched the screen. One experiment consisted of three sets of 30 trials. In the first set, the subject wore no prisms and vision was allowed without delay. In the second, the visual field was displaced by prisms, and vision was available only after a delay period of 0–10,000 msec while the subjects maintained their final pointing position. Initially, the subject misreached the target by about the amount of visual displacement (60 mm). Errors decreased with trials by an amount proportional to the error in the preceding trial. The rate of decrease of error was generally largest when the delay was 0 msec, became significantly smaller when the delay was 50 msec, and showed only gradual change with longer delays. In the third set, the subject wore no prisms and vision was allowed without delay. Initial misreaching in the direction opposite to the visual displacement, reflecting the amount of adaptation in the second set, was generally largest with no delay (median of 46 mm) and significantly smaller with 50 msec and longer delays (17–33 mm).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  S. Lisberger,et al.  Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. I. Changes in the responses of brain stem neurons. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  S. Freedman The Neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior , 1968 .

[3]  W T Thach,et al.  The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  R. Held,et al.  Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. , 1966 .

[5]  R B Welch,et al.  Evidence for a three-component model of prism adaptation. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  I. Bilodeau,et al.  Variation of temporal intervals among critical events in five studies of knowledge of results. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  B Wallace,et al.  Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: Organization of the eye-hand coordination loop , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  C. S. Harris Adaptation to Displaced Vision: Visual, Motor, or Proprioceptive Change? , 1963, Science.

[11]  J. Adams Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. , 1987 .

[12]  Paul Milgram,et al.  A spectacle-mounted liquid-crystal tachistoscope , 1987 .

[13]  伊藤 正男 The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[14]  M Glickstein,et al.  Proceedings: Role of cerebellum in prism adaptation. , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  H B Cohen Some critical factors in prism-adaptation. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  Edward Taub,et al.  Prism Adaptation: Control of Intermanual Transfer by Distribution of Practice , 1973, Science.

[17]  F. A. Miles,et al.  Plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular reflex: a new hypothesis. , 1981, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  In Search of Engrams a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  M. Mauk,et al.  Extinction of conditioned eyelid responses requires the anterior lobe of cerebellar cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[21]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Telepresence, time delay and adaptation , 1991 .

[22]  J E Foley,et al.  Comparison of training methods in the production of prism adaptation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  V. Lovelace-Chandler The Cerebellum and the Adaptive Coordination of Movement. Thach WT, Goodkin HP, Keating JG. Ann Rev Neurosci 15:403-442, 1992. , 1993 .

[24]  M. Hallett,et al.  Adaptation to lateral displacement of vision in patients with lesions of the central nervous system , 1983, Neurology.

[25]  R Held,et al.  Adaptation to displaced vision: a change in the central control of sensorimotor coordination. , 1971, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[26]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Computations underlying the execution of movement: a biological perspective. , 1991, Science.

[27]  S. Lisberger,et al.  Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. II. Changes in the responses of horizontal gaze velocity Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.