A new high-order response surface method for structural reliability analysis

In order to consider high-order effects on the actual limit state function, a new response surface method is proposed for structural reliability analysis by the use of high-order approximation concept in this study. Hermite polynomials are used to determine the highest orders of input random variables, and the sampling points for the determination of highest orders are located on Gaussian points of Gauss-Hermite integration. The cross terms between two random variables, only in case that their corresponding percent contributions to the total variation of limit state function are significant, will be added to the response surface function to improve the approximation accuracy. As a result, significant reduction in computational cost is achieved with this strategy. Due to the addition of cross terms, the additional sampling points, laid on two-dimensional Gaussian points off axis on the plane of two significant variables, are required to determine the coefficients of the approximated limit state function. All available sampling points are employed to construct the final response surface function. Then, Monte Carlo Simulation is carried out on the final approximation response surface function to estimate the failure probability. Due to the use of high order polynomial, the proposed method is more accurate than the traditional second-order or linear response surface method. It also provides much more efficient solutions than the available high-order response surface method with less loss in accuracy. The efficiency and the accuracy of the proposed method compared with those of various response surface methods available are illustrated by five numerical examples.

[1]  R. Melchers Importance sampling in structural systems , 1989 .

[2]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances , 1986 .

[3]  Irfan Kaymaz,et al.  Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .

[4]  P. Das,et al.  Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis , 2000 .

[5]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[6]  Xibing Li,et al.  Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network , 2005 .

[7]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  On the problems of the Fourth moment method , 2004 .

[8]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[9]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[10]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY UNDER INCOMPLETE PROBABILITY INFORMATION , 1986 .

[11]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Classification Approach for Reliability Analysis with Stochastic Finite-Element Modeling , 2003 .

[12]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  A general procedure for first/second-order reliabilitymethod (FORM/SORM) , 1999 .

[13]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Reliability-based structural optimization using neural networks and Monte Carlo simulation , 2002 .

[14]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  An overview of statistical learning theory , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[16]  R. Rackwitz Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives , 2001 .

[17]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  SYSTEM RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT BY METHOD OF MOMENTS , 2003 .

[18]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  Moment methods for structural reliability , 2001 .

[19]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Filtered importance sampling with support vector margin: A powerful method for structural reliability analysis , 2007 .

[20]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[21]  S. Rahman,et al.  A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics , 2004 .

[22]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study , 2001 .

[23]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[24]  Byung Man Kwak,et al.  Response surface augmented moment method for efficient reliability analysis , 2006 .

[25]  R. Grandhi,et al.  Safety index calculation using intervening variables for structural reliability analysis , 1996 .

[26]  Sang Hyo Kim,et al.  Response surface method using vector projected sampling points , 1997 .

[27]  I. Kaymaz,et al.  A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[28]  Yan-Gang Zhao,et al.  New Point Estimates for Probability Moments , 2000 .

[29]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Structural reliability under combined random load sequences , 1978 .

[30]  李洪双,et al.  SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE FOR STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ANALYSIS , 2006 .

[31]  Yeou-Koung Tung,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation for Correlated Variables with Marginal Distributions , 1994 .

[32]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Optimization algorithms for structural reliability , 1991 .

[33]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural system reliability assessment using directional simulation , 1994 .

[34]  Kuan-Yu Chen,et al.  Forecasting systems reliability based on support vector regression with genetic algorithms , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[35]  Jian Deng,et al.  Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network , 2006 .

[36]  J. Beck,et al.  A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations , 1999 .