Individual differences in acoustic and articulatory undershoot in a German diphthong - Variation between male and female speakers

Abstract Individual differences in speech production and, more specifically, in the realization of stress contrasts have been found previously (e.g. de Jong, 1995 ). This study extends this line of work by investigating potential gender-specific differences in the realization of different accent conditions and more specifically in the degree of undershoot. The reason suggested for these differences is the under-exploitation of the larger male articulatory space during running speech. Differences between male and female speakers in undershoot are investigated (a) by comparing the degree of undershoot in various accent conditions between male and female diphthong productions, and (b) by analyzing the degree of undershoot in relation to a speaker’s maximum articulatory vowel space. Articulatory and acoustic data from 11 German speakers (5 males, 6 females) of the diphthong /aɪ/ were analyzed in absolute terms and after normalization for a speaker’s maximal articulatory space. In addition to speaker-specific differences in undershoot and in the acoustic-articulatory relationship, results support gender-specific differences, with males exhibiting more undershoot than females in both articulatory and acoustic terms. After normalization with respect to a speaker’s maximum articulatory vowel space, females exhibit larger tongue back trajectories than males.

[1]  Pascal Perrier,et al.  On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  C A Fowler,et al.  Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  Alicia Beckford Wassink,et al.  A sociophonetic analysis of Jamaican vowels. , 1999 .

[4]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .

[5]  D. Ostry,et al.  Control of rate and duration of speech movements. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[7]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[8]  K. Moll,et al.  A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities , 1976 .

[9]  S. Whiteside,et al.  Sex-specific fundamental and formant frequency patterns in a cross-sectional study. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W. Fitch,et al.  Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Adrian P. Simpson,et al.  Gender-specific articulatory-acoustic relations in vowel sequences , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[12]  Caroline G. Henton,et al.  Breathiness in normal female speech: Inefficiency versus desirability , 1985 .

[13]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Stress-related variation in the articulation of coda alveolar stops: flapping revisited , 1998 .

[15]  H. Traunmüller,et al.  Paralinguistic Variation and Invariance in the Characteristic Frequencies of Vowels , 1988, Phonetica.

[16]  V. Kempe,et al.  Masculine Men Articulate Less Clearly , 2013, Human Nature.

[17]  Sandra P. Whiteside,et al.  Temporal-based acoustic-phonetic patterns in read speech: some evidence for speaker sex differences , 1996, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[18]  D. Ashmead,et al.  The acoustic bases for gender identification from children's voices. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Felix Schaeffler,et al.  Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Relations of sex and dialect to reduction , 1994, Speech Communication.

[21]  K. D. Jong.  The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation , 1995 .

[22]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[23]  Christine Mooshammer,et al.  Acoustic and articulatory manifestations of vowel reduction in German , 2008, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[24]  D Byrd,et al.  Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  A. Bandura.  Social learning theory , 1977 .

[26]  Kevin Heffernan.  MUMBLING IS MACHO: PHONETIC DISTINCTIVENESS IN THE SPEECH OF AMERICAN RADIO DJs , 2010 .

[27]  Leonardo Lancia,et al.  Inter-speaker articulatory variability during vowel-consonant-vowel sequences in twins and unrelated speakers. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Van Bezooijen,et al.  Sociocultural Aspects of Pitch Differences between Japanese and Dutch Women , 1995 .

[29]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Acoustic Vowel Reduction in Creek: Effects of Distinctive Length and Position in the Word , 2000, Phonetica.

[30]  B. Lindblom.  Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .

[31]  S. Öhman.  Numerical Model of Coarticulation , 1967 .

[32]  R. P. Fahey,et al.  On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories , 1996 .

[33]  Christine Ericsdotter,et al.  Gender differences in vowel duration in read Swedish: Preliminary results , 2009 .

[34]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[35]  P Ladefoged,et al.  Individual differences in vowel production. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Susanne Fuchs,et al.  Palatal morphology can influence speaker-specific realizations of phonemic contrasts. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[37]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[38]  M. Södersten,et al.  Glottal closure and perceived breathiness during phonation in normally speaking subjects. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  I. Titze.  Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  W. Labov.  The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change , 1990, Language Variation and Change.

[41]  L. Brizendine,et al.  The Female Brain , 2008 .

[42]  Adrian P. Simpson,et al.  Differences in acoustic vowel space and the perception of speech tempo , 2014, J. Phonetics.

[43]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[44]  Fangfang Li,et al.  The development of sex/gender-specific /s/ and its relationship to gender identity in children and adolescents , 2016, J. Phonetics.

[45]  P. Perrier,et al.  Mumbling: Macho or Morphology? , 2016, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[46]  M. Beckman,et al.  The Interplay Between Prosodic Structure and Coarticulation , 1993, Language and speech.

[47]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[48]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Acoustics of children's speech: developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  A. Simpson,et al.  Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.