Wavelet-based Rician noise removal for magnetic resonance imaging

It is well known that magnetic resonance magnitude image data obey a Rician distribution. Unlike additive Gaussian noise, Rician "noise" is signal-dependent, and separating signal from noise is a difficult task. Rician noise is especially problematic in low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regimes where it not only causes random fluctuations, but also introduces a signal-dependent bias to the data that reduces image contrast. This paper studies wavelet-domain filtering methods for Rician noise removal. We present a novel wavelet-domain filter that adapts to variations in both the signal and the noise.

[1]  C. Burrus,et al.  Noise reduction using an undecimated discrete wavelet transform , 1996, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[2]  Richard A. Baum,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Concepts and Applications , 1995 .

[3]  S. O. Rice,et al.  Statistical properties of a sine wave plus random noise , 1948, Bell Syst. Tech. J..

[4]  D. Donoho.  Unconditional Bases Are Optimal Bases for Data Compression and for Statistical Estimation , 1993 .

[5]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[6]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  W. Edelstein,et al.  A signal-to-noise calibration procedure for NMR imaging systems. , 1984, Medical physics.

[8]  L. Scharf,et al.  Statistical Signal Processing: Detection, Estimation, and Time Series Analysis , 1991 .

[9]  L D Cromwell,et al.  Filtering noise from images with wavelet transforms , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  E. L. Lehmann,et al.  Theory of point estimation , 1950 .

[11]  M. Smith,et al.  An unbiased signal-to-noise ratio measure for magnetic resonance images. , 1993, Medical physics.

[12]  R. Nowak.  Optimal signal estimation using cross-validation , 1997, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[13]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[14]  W. Perman,et al.  Improved detectability in low signal-to-noise ratio magnetic resonance images by means of a phase-corrected real reconstruction. , 1989, Medical physics.

[15]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Univariate Discrete Distributions , 1993 .

[16]  Robert Nowak,et al.  Noise removal methods for high resolution MRI , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[17]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Wavelet domain filtering for photon imaging systems , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[18]  M. Bronskill,et al.  Noise and filtration in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Medical physics.

[19]  A. Macovski.  Noise in MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Why MEM does not work in MR image reconstruction , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  R. Henkelman.  Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[22]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Singularity detection and processing with wavelets , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[23]  D. Noll,et al.  Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[24]  W Richter,et al.  Limitations of temporal resolution in functional MRI , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Wavelet-domain filtering for photon imaging systems , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[26]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Adapting to Unknown Smoothness via Wavelet Shrinkage , 1995 .

[27]  E. Potchen.  Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Concepts & Applications , 1993 .

[28]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[29]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant De-Noising , 1995 .

[30]  W. Edelstein,et al.  The intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio in NMR imaging , 1986, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Aaron J. Miller,et al.  The use of power images to perform quantitative analysis on low SNR MR images. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.