Analysing sensory panel performance in a proficiency test using the PanelCheck software

This paper discusses statistical methods and a workflow strategy for comparing performance across multiple sensory panels that participated in a proficiency test (also referred to as inter laboratory test). Performance comparison and analysis are based on a data set collected from 26 sensory panels carrying out profiling on the same set of candy samples. The candy samples were produced according to an experimental design using design factors, such as sugar, and acid level. Because of the exceptionally large amount of data and the availability of multiple statistical and graphical tools in the PanelCheck software, a workflow is proposed that guides the user through the data analysis process. This allows practitioners and non-statisticians to get an overview over panel performances in a rapid manner without the need to be familiar with details on the statistical methods. Visualisation of data analysis results plays an important role as this provides a time saving and efficient way of screening and investigating sensory panel performances. Most of the statistical methods used in this paper are available in the open source software PanelCheck, which may be downloaded and used for free.

[1]  L. Tucker,et al.  Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis , 1966, Psychometrika.

[2]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Measuring validity in sensory analysis , 1995 .

[3]  Per M. Brockhoff,et al.  Modelling individual differences between assessors in sensory evaluations , 1994 .

[4]  Jérôme Pagès,et al.  Inter-laboratory comparison of sensory profiles: methodology and results , 2001 .

[5]  Harold Gulliksen,et al.  Contributions to mathematical psychology , 1964 .

[6]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Detection and interpretation of variation within and between assessors in sensory profiling , 1991 .

[7]  Jean A. McEwan Comparison of sensory panels : a ring trial , 1999 .

[8]  Sébastien Lê,et al.  Methodology for the comparison of sensory profiles provided by several panels: Application to a cross-cultural study , 2008 .

[9]  M. Thompson,et al.  The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of (chemical) analytical laboratories (Technical Report) , 1993 .

[10]  Jean A. McEwan,et al.  Evaluation of an International Ring Trial for Sensory Profiling of Hard Cheese 1 Contributions from , 1998 .

[11]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Some new tools for visualising multi-way sensory data , 2008 .

[12]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Fixed or random assessors in sensory profiling , 1998 .

[13]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Handling individual differences between assessors in sensory profiling , 1990 .

[14]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Visualization of sensory profiling data for performance monitoring , 2007 .