Road traffic congestion measurement considering impacts on travelers

The article intends to find a method to quantify traffic congestion’s impacts on travelers to help transportation planners and policy decision makers well understand congestion situations. Three new congestion indicators, including transportation environment satisfaction (TES), travel time satisfaction (TTS), and traffic congestion frequency and feeling (TCFF), are defined to estimate urban traffic congestion based on travelers’ feelings. Data of travelers’ attitude about congestion and trip information were collected from a survey in Shanghai, China. Based on the survey data, we estimated the value of the three indicators. Then, the principal components analysis was used to derive a small number of linear combinations of a set of variables to estimate the whole congestion status. A linear regression model was used to find out the significant variables which impact respondents’ feelings. Two ordered logit models were used to select significant variables of TES and TTS. Attitudinal factor variables were also used in these models. The results show that attitudinal factor variables and cluster category variables are as important as sociodemographic variables in the models. Using the three congestion indicators, the government can collect travelers’ feeling about traffic congestion and estimate the transportation policy that might be applied to cope with traffic congestion.

[1]  S. Handy,et al.  QUALITATIVE METHODS IN TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH , 2003 .

[2]  Barbara Guest,et al.  Passion for Poetry , 2007 .

[3]  R. Bertini,et al.  Congestion and its Extent , 2005 .

[4]  Emily Parkany,et al.  Measuring Traffic Congestion , 1998 .

[5]  K. Zimmermann,et al.  PSEUDO‐R2 MEASURES FOR SOME COMMON LIMITED DEPENDENT VARIABLE MODELS , 1996 .

[6]  Sangho Choo,et al.  How do people respond to congestion mitigation policies? A multivariate probit model of the individual consideration of three travel-related strategy bundles , 2008 .

[7]  Shinya Kikuchi,et al.  Precision of predicted travel time, the responses of travellers, and satisfaction in the travel experience , 2005 .

[8]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Coping with Congestion: Understanding the Gap Between Policy Assumptions and Behavior , 1997 .

[9]  Ilan Salomon,et al.  Behavioral response to congestion: identifying patterns and socio-economic differences in adoption , 1997 .

[10]  Brian D. Taylor,et al.  Rethinking Traffic Congestion , 2002 .

[11]  Alison F. Davis,et al.  The Impact of Traffic Congestion on Household Behavior: Three Essays on the Role of Heterogeneity , 2004 .

[12]  Timothy J Lomax,et al.  Developing a Travel Time Congestion Index , 1996 .

[13]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian Topical Issues Paper Reducing road congestion: a reality check—a comment , 2004 .

[14]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Car dependence in a public transport dominated city: evidence from Hong Kong , 2003 .

[15]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Modeling the Desire to Telecommute: The Importance of Attitudinal Factors in Behavioral Models , 1997 .

[16]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[17]  Lothlorien S. Redmond Identifying and Analyzing Travel-Related Attitudinal, Personality, and Lifestyle Clusters in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2000 .

[18]  Jean-Paul Fox,et al.  Using Item Response Theory to Measure Extreme Response Style in Marketing Research: A Global Investigation , 2008 .

[19]  Kees Maat,et al.  Measuring Attitudes in Research on Residential Self‐Selection and Travel Behaviour: A Review of Theories and Empirical Research , 2009 .

[20]  Musaad Al-Mosaind,et al.  Freeway traffic congestion in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: attitudes and policy implications , 1998 .