Femorotibial subchondral bone area and regional cartilage thickness: A cross‐sectional description in healthy reference cases and various radiographic stages of osteoarthritis in 1,003 knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

To identify structural differences in total subchondral bone area (tAB) and cartilage thickness between healthy reference knees and knees with radiographic osteoarthritis (OA).

[1]  M Lequesne,et al.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. , 1995, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Early radiographic osteoarthritis is associated with substantial changes in cartilage volume and tibial bone surface area in both males and females. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

[3]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  S Totterman,et al.  Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  F. Eckstein,et al.  An efficient subset of morphological measures for articular cartilage in the healthy and diseased human knee , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  L. Sharma,et al.  Medial-to-Lateral Ratio of Tibiofemoral Subchondral Bone Area is Adapted to Alignment and Mechanical Load , 2009, Calcified Tissue International.

[7]  F Eckstein,et al.  Magnitude and regional distribution of cartilage loss associated with grades of joint space narrowing in radiographic osteoarthritis--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[8]  G. Gold,et al.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[9]  J. Lynch,et al.  Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.

[10]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Women have thinner cartilage and smaller joint surfaces than men after adjustment for body height and weight. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[11]  Xiaojuan Li,et al.  Relationship between trabecular bone structure and articular cartilage morphology and relaxation times in early OA of the knee joint using parallel MRI at 3 T. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  Menkès Cj Radiographic criteria for classification of osteoarthritis. , 1991 .

[14]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Longitudinal performance evaluation and validation of fixed-flexion radiography of the knee for detection of joint space loss. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  R Burgkart,et al.  Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[16]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in tibial plateau bone area in osteoarthritic knees: a cohort study , 2005, Arthritis research & therapy.

[17]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  A Technique for Regional Analysis of Femorotibial Cartilage Thickness Based on Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  K. Brandt,et al.  Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  C. Menkes Radiographic criteria for classification of osteoarthritis. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[20]  Erika Schneider,et al.  The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  K J Rothman,et al.  No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple Comparisons , 1990, Epidemiology.

[22]  F Eckstein,et al.  Osteoarthritis may not be a one-way-road of cartilage loss--comparison of spatial patterns of cartilage change between osteoarthritic and healthy knees. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[23]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Does cartilage volume or thickness distinguish knees with and without mild radiographic osteoarthritis? The Framingham Study , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[25]  H C Charles,et al.  Subregional femorotibial cartilage morphology in women--comparison between healthy controls and participants with different grades of radiographic knee osteoarthritis. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[26]  F Eckstein,et al.  Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[27]  Jh. Kellgren Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis , 1957 .

[28]  R Gullapalli,et al.  The osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance methods and results. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[29]  F Eckstein,et al.  Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[30]  H C Charles,et al.  Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[31]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Tibial subchondral bone size and knee cartilage defects: relevance to knee osteoarthritis. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[32]  M. Reiser,et al.  Gender differences in knee joint cartilage thickness, volume and articular surface areas: assessment with quantitative three-dimensional MR imaging , 2001, Skeletal Radiology.

[33]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Relationship of compartment-specific structural knee status at baseline with change in cartilage morphology: a prospective observational study using data from the osteoarthritis initiative , 2009, Arthritis research & therapy.

[34]  F Eckstein,et al.  Sensitivity to change of cartilage morphometry using coronal FLASH, sagittal DESS, and coronal MPR DESS protocols--comparative data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[35]  F Eckstein,et al.  Functional adaptation of human joints to mechanical stimuli. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[36]  F Eckstein,et al.  Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[37]  F. Eckstein,et al.  One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[38]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging of cartilage and trabecular bone in osteoarthritis. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[39]  N. Theumann,et al.  [Imaging in osteoarthritis]. , 2012, Revue medicale suisse.

[40]  A. Guermazi,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of subchondral bone and soft tissues in knee osteoarthritis. , 2009, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[41]  R. Buck,et al.  The acutely ACL injured knee assessed by MRI: changes in joint fluid, bone marrow lesions, and cartilage during the first year. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[42]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Factors affecting progression of knee cartilage defects in normal subjects over 2 years. , 2006, Rheumatology.

[43]  K. Brandt,et al.  Anterior (cranial) cruciate ligament transection in the dog: a bona fide model of osteoarthritis, not merely of cartilage injury and repair. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology.

[44]  R Burgkart,et al.  Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.