The Functionality, Evidence, and Privacy Issues Around Smartphone Apps for the Top Neuropsychiatric Conditions.

OBJECTIVE There are more than 325,000 health-related smartphone applications (apps) on the market. To better understand the apps currently on the market for the five most disabling neuropsychiatric conditions, the authors conducted a study investigating their intended uses (target population and intervention), the data collected, and any privacy policies. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of apps for the five most disabling neuropsychiatric conditions per the World Health Organization: stroke, migraine, depression, Alzheimer's disease and dementia, and anxiety. Up to 15 apps in the U.S. Google Play and Apple app stores were selected based on the following prespecified inclusion criteria: the app appeared in the top 50 search results, offered intervention or tracking capabilities, and listed the condition in the app title or description. Exclusion criteria were <$5.00 to purchase, solely motor versus cognitive-based intervention, or designed for use by caregivers or health care providers. Data abstracted included function, behavior change rewards, and information about intervention, privacy policy, and payment. RESULTS Eighty-three apps were reviewed (stroke, N=8; migraine, N=25; Alzheimer's disease and dementia, N=8; depression, N=7; anxiety, N=14; apps targeting depression and anxiety, N=21). Sixty-nine percent of apps had an intervention component, 18% were deemed evidence based, 77% had a privacy policy, 70% required payment for access to all features, and 19% rewarded user behavior changes. CONCLUSIONS Most apps on the market targeted migraine, depression, and anxiety and contained interventions, although most of the interventions did not appear to be evidence based. Additionally, although most apps had privacy policies, lay people may have difficulty understanding these policies due to their complexities.

[1]  M. Holodniy,et al.  Candida auris in the US Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) , 2020, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[2]  J. Geddes,et al.  Smartphones in mental health: a critical review of background issues, current status and future concerns , 2020, International Journal of Bipolar Disorders.

[3]  John Wilbanks,et al.  Indicators of retention in remote digital health studies: a cross-study evaluation of 100,000 participants , 2019, npj Digital Medicine.

[4]  S. Bartels,et al.  Do you observe what I perceive? The relationship between two perspectives on the ability of people with cognitive impairments to use everyday technology , 2020, Aging & mental health.

[5]  Camilla Malinowsky,et al.  A narrative synthesis systematic review of digital self-monitoring interventions for middle-aged and older adults , 2019, Internet interventions.

[6]  Antoine Piau,et al.  Current State of Digital Biomarker Technologies for Real-Life, Home-Based Monitoring of Cognitive Function for Mild Cognitive Impairment to Mild Alzheimer Disease and Implications for Clinical Care: Systematic Review , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  John Torous,et al.  Assessment of the Data Sharing and Privacy Practices of Smartphone Apps for Depression and Smoking Cessation , 2019, JAMA network open.

[8]  John Torous,et al.  Current Regulation of Mobile Mental Health Applications , 2018, The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[9]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Prescribable mHealth apps identified from an overview of systematic reviews , 2018, npj Digital Medicine.

[10]  B. Satiani,et al.  Projected Workforce of Psychiatrists in the United States: A Population Analysis. , 2018, Psychiatric services.

[11]  John Torous,et al.  New tests, new tools: mobile and connected technologies in advancing psychiatric diagnosis , 2018, npj Digital Medicine.

[12]  J. Torous,et al.  A Hierarchical Framework for Evaluation and Informed Decision Making Regarding Smartphone Apps for Clinical Care. , 2018, Psychiatric services.

[13]  John Torous,et al.  The efficacy of smartphone‐based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2017, World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association.

[14]  John Torous,et al.  Data Security and Privacy in Apps for Dementia: An Analysis of Existing Privacy Policies. , 2017, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[15]  P. Klainin-Yobas,et al.  Therapist-Supported Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Stress, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms Among Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  J. Carroll,et al.  Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Rose-Marie Dröes,et al.  Technologies to Support Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia: A Position Paper on Issues Regarding Development, Usability, Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness, Deployment, and Ethics , 2017, JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies.

[18]  M. Carrillo,et al.  Research priorities to reduce the global burden of dementia by 2025 , 2016, The Lancet Neurology.

[19]  Mark Erik Larsen,et al.  Quantifying App Store Dynamics: Longitudinal Tracking of Mental Health Apps , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[20]  B. Ovbiagele,et al.  Stroke patients and their attitudes toward mHealth monitoring to support blood pressure control and medication adherence. , 2016, mHealth.

[21]  Dong Zhou,et al.  Feasibility and acceptability of smartphone applications for seizure self-management in China: Questionnaire study among people with epilepsy , 2016, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[22]  J. Hayden,et al.  Therapist-supported internet cognitive—behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults , 2015, BJPsych Advances.

[23]  Foreman,et al.  The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. , 2013, JAMA.

[24]  Victor W. Henderson,et al.  Supply and demand analysis of the current and future US neurology workforce , 2013, Neurology.