The psychological conditions for employee engagement in organizational change: Test of a change engagement model

In the contemporary world of work, organizational change is a constant. For change to be successful, employees need to be positive about implementing organizational change. Change engagement reflects the extent to which employees are enthusiastic about change, and willing to actively involve themselves in promoting and supporting ongoing organizational change. Drawing from Kahn’s engagement theory, the research aimed to assess the influence of change-related meaningful work, psychological safety, and self-efficacy as psychological preconditions for change engagement. The study also aimed to test the indirect associations of the change-related psychological preconditions with proactive work behavior through change engagement. Survey data from a Prolific sample (N = 297) were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equations modeling. In support of the validity of the model, the results showed that change-related self-efficacy, psychological safety, and meaningfulness had significant direct effects on change engagement, explaining 88% of the variance. The change-related psychological conditions also had significant indirect effects on proactive work behavior through change engagement. The findings therefore suggest that employees who exhibit higher levels of change-related self-efficacy, psychological safety, and work meaningfulness are more likely to support and promote organizational change, and to proactively engage in innovative work behavior. In practical terms, organizations that create the psychological conditions for change could significantly improve employee motivation to change and to innovate, which in turn would increase the likelihood of successful organizational change, and improved organizational competitiveness. Study limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  The impact of engaging leadership on employee engagement and team effectiveness: A longitudinal, multi-level study on the mediating role of personal- and team resources , 2022, PloS one.

[2]  M. Leiter,et al.  The Influence of Change-Related Organizational and Job Resources on Employee Change Engagement , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[3]  Aimin Wang,et al.  Organizational Justice and Employee Readiness for Change: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[4]  John H. Batchelor,et al.  Job Attitudes: A Meta‐Analytic Review and an Agenda for Future Research , 2022, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[5]  Mark Hughes.  Reflections: How Studying Organizational Change Lost Its Way , 2022, Journal of Change Management.

[6]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Pro-Environmental Employee Engagement: The Influence of Pro-Environmental Organizational, Job and Personal Resources , 2021, Sustainability.

[7]  A. Forsman,et al.  Bottom-Up Interventions Effective in Promoting Work Engagement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[8]  H. Holling,et al.  How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: a meta-analysis , 2021, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

[9]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Meaningful Work, Job Resources, and Employee Engagement , 2021, Sustainability.

[10]  A. Malhotra.  The Postpandemic Future of Work , 2021, Journal of Management.

[11]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A Research Agenda for Employee Engagement in a Changing World of Work , 2021 .

[12]  S. Albrecht.  Employee engagement and engagement in change: a research agenda , 2021 .

[13]  A. Bakker,et al.  How do Employees Adapt to Organizational Change? The Role of Meaning-making and Work Engagement , 2020, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[14]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Change Engagement, Change Resources, and Change Demands: A Model for Positive Employee Orientations to Organizational Change , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[15]  D. Bouckenooghe,et al.  Organizational change failure: Framing the process of failing , 2020, Human Relations.

[16]  S. Parker,et al.  Looking back and looking ahead: Applying organisational behaviour to explain the changing face of work , 2020 .

[17]  T. Kim,et al.  An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model , 2020 .

[18]  J. Jolton,et al.  Exploring the Universe of Pulse Surveys and Continuous Listening Opportunities , 2020 .

[19]  J. Nunnally,et al.  Psychometric Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[20]  Amir Riaz,et al.  Linking employees change-related self-efficacy, change readiness and commitment to change , 2020 .

[21]  P. Kruyen,et al.  The Attitudinal, Behavioral, and Performance Outcomes of Work Engagement: A Comparative Meta-Analysis Across the Public, Semipublic, and Private Sector , 2020, Review of Public Personnel Administration.

[22]  Patrick F. Bruning,et al.  Exploring job crafting: Diagnosing and responding to the ways employees adjust their jobs , 2019, Business Horizons.

[23]  Luke Fletcher,et al.  Facilitating meaningfulness in the workplace: a field intervention study , 2019, The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

[24]  B. Allan,et al.  Outcomes of Meaningful Work: A Meta‐Analysis , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[25]  Sheryl L. Walter,et al.  A Tale of Two Sample Sources: Do Results from Online Panel Data and Conventional Data Converge? , 2018, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[26]  F. Stinglhamber,et al.  Organizational Justice and Readiness for Change: A Concomitant Examination of the Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Identification , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[27]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Successful Organizational Change: Integrating the Management Practice and Scholarly Literatures , 2018, Academy of Management Annals.

[28]  M. Vakola,et al.  Organizational Change: Psychological effects and strategies for coping , 2018 .

[29]  M. Vakola,et al.  Measuring change recipients’ reactions , 2018 .

[30]  M. Shaffer,et al.  Antecedents of organizational and community embeddedness: The roles of support, psychological safety, and need to belong , 2018 .

[31]  F. Luthans,et al.  Testing a dynamic model of the impact of psychological capital on work engagement and job performance , 2018 .

[32]  N. Jimmieson,et al.  Individual and external coping resources as predictors of employees’ change attitudes , 2018 .

[33]  Karsten Mueller,et al.  A Configurational Perspective on the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Understand Employees' Change‐Supportive Intentions , 2018 .

[34]  Bryan C. Hayes,et al.  The Development, Validation, and Practical Application of an Employee Agility and Resilience Measure to Facilitate Organizational Change , 2017, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[35]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job Demands–Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward , 2017, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[36]  Amir Pezeshkan,et al.  Psychological Safety : A Meta ‐ Analytic Review and Extension , 2018 .

[37]  N. Kawakami,et al.  Effects of a job crafting intervention program on work engagement among Japanese employees: a pretest-posttest study , 2016, BMC psychology.

[38]  Karsten Mueller,et al.  Assessing Employees’ Reactions to Organizational Change , 2016 .

[39]  J. V. van Merriënboer,et al.  Measuring adaptive expertise: development and validation of an instrument , 2016 .

[40]  E. Knies,et al.  Psychological capital, adaptability, coping with change, and employee engagement in a multinational company , 2015 .

[41]  W. Schaufeli.  Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model , 2015 .

[42]  P. Harms,et al.  25 years of higher‐order confirmatory factor analysis in the organizational sciences: A critical review and development of reporting recommendations , 2015 .

[43]  Ayu Aprilianti Lizar,et al.  The Role of Psychological Capital and Psychological Empowerment on Individual Readiness for Change , 2015 .

[44]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation and Creativity in Organizations , 2014 .

[45]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  Moritz Heene,et al.  Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[47]  Myungweon Choi,et al.  Employees' attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review , 2011 .

[48]  Christopher C. Rosen,et al.  Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational Change , 2011 .

[50]  Michael P. Leiter,et al.  Key questions regarding work engagement , 2011 .

[51]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  M. West,et al.  Engaged work teams , 2010 .

[53]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  JOB ENGAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND EFFECTS ON JOB PERFORMANCE , 2010 .

[54]  S. Albrecht.  Employee engagement: 10 key questions for research and practice , 2010 .

[55]  Bert Schreurs,et al.  Does meaning‐making help during organizational change? Development and validation of a new scale , 2009 .

[56]  Geert Devos,et al.  Organizational Change Questionnaire–Climate of Change, Processes, and Readiness: Development of a New Instrument , 2009, The Journal of psychology.

[57]  J. Hakanen,et al.  Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness , 2008 .

[58]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour , 2008 .

[59]  F. Luthans,et al.  Positive Organizational Behavior in the Workplace , 2007 .

[60]  James B. Avey,et al.  POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION , 2007 .

[61]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Role of Personal Resources in the Job Demands-Resources Model , 2007 .

[62]  S. Parker,et al.  A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts , 2007 .

[63]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[64]  James B. Avey,et al.  Psychological capital development: toward a micro-intervention , 2006, Journal of Organizational Behavior.

[65]  Douglas R. May,et al.  The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work , 2004 .

[66]  Nerina L Jimmieson,et al.  A longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organizational change: the role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy. , 2004, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[67]  M. Frese,et al.  Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance , 2003 .

[68]  T. Thrall.  Work redesign. , 2003, Hospitals & health networks.

[69]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[70]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[71]  J. Jaccard,et al.  LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1998 .

[72]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[73]  William A. Kahn.  Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[74]  A. Bandura.  Human agency in social cognitive theory. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[75]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[76]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[77]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[78]  W. Bennis,et al.  Learning for Leadership.@@@Personal and Organizational Change Through Group Methods: The Laboratory Approach. , 1966 .