Experts and Novices Use the Same Factors–But Differently–To Evaluate Pearl Quality

Well-trained experts in pearl grading have been thought to evaluate pearls according to their glossiness, interference color, and shape. However, the characteristics of their evaluations are not fully understood. Using pearl grading experiments, we investigate the consistency of novice (i.e., without knowledge of pearl grading) and expert participants’ pearl grading skill and then compare the novices’ grading with that of experts; furthermore, we discuss the relationship between grading, interference color, and glossiness. We found that novices’ grading was significantly less concordant with experts average grading than was experts’ grading; more than half of novices graded pearls the opposite of how experts graded those same pearls. However, while experts graded pearls more consistently than novices did, novices’ consistency was relatively high. We also found differences between the groups in regression analyses that used interference color and glossiness as explanatory variables and were conducted for each trial. Although the regression coefficient was significant in 60% of novices’ trials, there were fewer significant trials for the experts (20%). This indicates that novices can also make use of these two factors, but that their usage is simpler than that of the experts. These results suggest that experts and novices share some values about pearls but that the evaluation method is elaborated for experts.

[1]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans , 2009, Neuron.

[2]  E. Gombrich,et al.  Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation , 1960 .

[3]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[4]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[5]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[6]  José E. Náñez,et al.  Greater plasticity in lower-level than higher-level visual motion processing in a passive perceptual learning task , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  S. Nordin,et al.  Perceptual Learning in Olfaction Professional Wine Tasters versus Controls , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.

[9]  Hiroshi Nakajima,et al.  Development of a Pearl Quality Evaluation System Based on an Instrumentation of “Kansei” , 1992 .

[10]  Jocelyn Faubert,et al.  Professional athletes have extraordinary skills for rapidly learning complex and neutral dynamic visual scenes , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Perceptual learning without perception , 2001, Nature.

[12]  Shigeki Nakauchi,et al.  Optical measurement of interference color of pearls and its relation to subjective quality , 2013 .

[13]  Nao Ninomiya,et al.  The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..

[14]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The Perception and Misperception of Specular Surface Reflectance , 2012, Current Biology.

[15]  E. Gombrich.  ART AND ILLUSION: A STUDY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION. , 1960 .

[16]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Is artists' perception more veridical? , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[17]  A. Kimura,et al.  Superiority of experts over novices in trueness and precision of concentration estimation of sodium chloride solutions. , 2013, Chemical senses.

[18]  Seiji Inokuchi,et al.  Modeling and Visualization for a Pearl-Quality Evaluation Simulator , 1997, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[19]  A. Williams,et al.  Visual search strategy, selective attention, and expertise in soccer. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[20]  A. Kramer,et al.  Are expert athletes 'expert' in the cognitive laboratory? A meta-analytic review of cognition and sport expertise , 2010 .

[21]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[22]  Keijiro Yamamoto,et al.  Toward interdisciplinary cooperation in visualization , 2001 .

[23]  P. McLeod.  Visual Reaction Time and High-Speed Ball Games , 1987, Perception.

[24]  D. Newport,et al.  Transient natural convection in a conducting enclosure heated from above , 2013, J. Vis..

[25]  Shinji Kitagami,et al.  Consolidation power of extrinsic rewards: reward cues enhance long-term memory for irrelevant past events. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Jacques Poitevineau,et al.  Player preferences among new and old violins , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.