Demystifying knowledge translation: learning from the community

Objectives: While there is increasing interest in research related to so-called Knowledge Translation, much of this research is undertaken from the perspective of researchers. The objective of this paper is to explore, through the participatory evaluation of Manitoba's The Need to Know Project, the characteristics of effective knowledge translation initiatives from the perspective of community partners. Methods: The multi-method evaluation adopted a utilization-focused approach, where stakeholders participated in identifying evaluation questions, and methods were made transparent to participants. Over 100 open-ended, semi-structured interviews were conducted with project stakeholders over the first three years of the project. These interviews explored the perspectives of participants on all aspects of project development. Formal feedback processes allowed further refinement of emerging theory. Results: This research suggests that there has been insufficient emphasis on personal factors in knowledge translation. The themes of 'quality of relationships' and 'trust' connected many different components of knowledge translation, and were essential for collaborative research. Organizational barriers and lack of confidence in researchers present greater challenges to knowledge translation than individual interest or community capacity. The costs of participation in collaborative research for community partners and the benefits for researchers, also require greater attention. Conclusions: Participation of community partners in The Need to Know Project has provided unique perspectives on knowledge translation theory. It has identified limitations to the common interpretations of knowledge translation principles and highlighted the characteristics of collaborative research initiatives that are of greatest importance to community partners.

[1]  P Howden-Chapman,et al.  Translating research findings into health policy. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[2]  R. Rosenheck,et al.  Organizational process: a missing link between research and practice. , 2001, Psychiatric services.

[3]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada , 2001 .

[4]  N. Broner,et al.  Knowledge Transfer, Policymaking and Community Empowerment: A Consensus Model Approach for Providing Public Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services , 2004, Psychiatric Quarterly.

[5]  David L Buckeridge,et al.  Making health data maps: a case study of a community/university research collaboration. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[6]  R. Daft,et al.  Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics , 2001 .

[7]  M. Patton Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text , 1997 .

[8]  J. Lavis,et al.  How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? , 2003, The Milbank quarterly.

[9]  E Shapiro,et al.  From research to policy: what have we learned? , 1999, Medical care.

[10]  John N Lavis,et al.  Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[11]  Martin J Buxton,et al.  The utilisation of health research in policy-making : concepts , examples and methods of assessment , 2003 .

[12]  RESEARCH AT WORK: A RESEARCH-TRANSFER PROJECT IN THREE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES , 2002 .

[13]  J Lomas,et al.  Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. , 2000, Health affairs.

[14]  J Lomas,et al.  Finding audiences, changing beliefs: the structure of research use in Canadian health policy. , 1990, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[15]  Amy L. Pablo,et al.  Toward a communicative perspective of collaborating in research: The case of the researcher-decision-maker partnership , 2003, Journal of health services research & policy.

[16]  J Lomas,et al.  Diffusion, Dissemination, and Implementation: Who Should Do What? , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. Marshall Improving quality in general practice: qualitative case study of barriers faced by health authorities , 1999, BMJ.

[18]  A. Casebeer,et al.  Potholes in the Information Highway: The Use of Health Service Utilization Data by Alberta Health Care Managers , 2000, Healthcare management forum.

[19]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Doing Research that is Useful to Practice a Model and Empirical Exploration , 2001 .

[20]  A. Oxman,et al.  Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[21]  Mark Ginsburg,et al.  Relationships between Theorists/Researchers and Policy Makers/Practitioners: Rethinking the Two‐Cultures Thesis and the Possibility of Dialogue , 2001, Comparative Education Review.

[22]  A. McColl,et al.  What do health authorities think of population based health outcome indicators? , 1998, Quality in health care : QHC.