A step towards new irrigation scheduling strategies using plant-based measurements and mathematical modelling

Because of the increasing worldwide shortage of freshwater and costs of irrigation, a new plant-based irrigation scheduling method is proposed. In this method, two real-time plant-based measurements (sap flow and stem diameter variations) are used in combination with a mathematical water flow and storage model in order to predict the stem water potential. The amount of required irrigation water is derived from a time integration of the sap flow profile, while the timing of the irrigation is controlled based on a reference value for the predicted stem water potential. This reference value is derived from the relationship between midday values of maximum photosynthesis rates and stem water potential. Since modelling is an important part of the proposed methodology, a thorough mathematical analysis (identifiability analysis) of the model was performed. This analysis showed that an initial (offline) model calibration was needed based on measurements of sap flow, stem diameter variation and stem water potential. Regarding irrigation scheduling, however, only sap flow and stem diameter variation measurements are needed for online simulation and daily model calibration. Model calibration is performed using a moving window of 4 days of past data of stem diameter variations. The research tool STACI (Software Tool for Automatic Control of Irrigation) was used to optimally combine the continuous measurements, the mathematical modelling and the real-time irrigation scheduling. The new methodology was successfully tested in a pilot-scale setup with young potted apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh) and its performance was critically evaluated.

[1]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[2]  Robert G. Evans,et al.  Irrigation of fruit trees and vines: an introduction , 2005, Irrigation Science.

[3]  T. Simonneau,et al.  Diurnal Changes in Stem Diameter Depend Upon Variations in Water Content: Direct Evidence in Peach Trees , 1993 .

[4]  D. Chalmers,et al.  Control of peach tree growth and productivity by regulated water supply, tree density, and summer pruning [Trickle irrigation] , 1981 .

[5]  R. Lemeur,et al.  An experimental system for analysis of the dynamic sap-flow characteristics in young trees: results of a beech tree. , 2004, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[6]  Terry A. Howell,et al.  Encyclopedia of water science. , 2003 .

[7]  J. Doltra,et al.  Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions , 2007, Irrigation Science.

[8]  Elias Fereres,et al.  Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements , 2001, Irrigation Science.

[9]  L. González,et al.  Plant Water Status , 2001 .

[10]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[11]  A. J. Udink ten Cate,et al.  Computer control of greenhouse climates , 1978 .

[12]  M. Böttger,et al.  Auxin-induced changes in cell wall extensibility of maize roots , 1998, Planta.

[13]  Theodore C. Hsiao,et al.  Seasonal Changes in Water Potential and Turgor Maintenance in Sorghum and Maize under Water Stress , 1978 .

[14]  D. Intrigliolo,et al.  Continuous measurement of plant and soil water status for irrigation scheduling in plum , 2004, Irrigation Science.

[15]  R. Zweifel,et al.  Link between diurnal stem radius changes and tree water relations. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[16]  A. Naor,et al.  Sensitivity and Variability of Maximum Trunk Shrinkage, Midday Stem Water Potential, and Transpiration Rate in Response to Withholding Irrigation from Field-grown Apple Trees , 2003 .

[17]  J. Boyer,et al.  Separating growth from elastic deformation during cell enlargement , 1999, Plant physiology.

[18]  G. Vercambre,et al.  An analysis of elastic and plastic fruit growth of mango in response to various assimilate supplies. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[19]  Kathy Steppe,et al.  Diurnal dynamics of water flow through trees: design and validation of a mathematical flow and storage model , 2004 .

[20]  A. Naor,et al.  The effect of irrigation and crop load on stem water potential and apple fruit size , 1997 .

[21]  J. Alarcón,et al.  Stem and leaf water potentials, gas exchange, sap flow, and trunk diameter fluctuations for detecting water stress in lemon trees , 2005, Trees.

[22]  E. Fereres,et al.  Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees , 2003 .

[23]  E. Garnier,et al.  Testing water potential in peach trees as an indicator of water stress , 1985 .

[24]  A. Chouzouri,et al.  Optimization of irrigation water use in grapevines using the relationship between transpiration and plant water status , 2005 .

[25]  H. Cochard,et al.  Experimental analysis of the role of water and carbon in tree stem diameter variations. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  D J W De Pauw,et al.  Identifiability analysis and improvement of a tree water flow and storage model. , 2008, Mathematical biosciences.

[27]  H. Jones.  Monitoring plant and soil water status: established and novel methods revisited and their relevance to studies of drought tolerance. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[28]  J E Begg,et al.  Water potential gradients in field tobacco. , 1970, Plant physiology.

[29]  Kenneth A. Shackel,et al.  Stem-water Potential as a Sensitive Indicator of Water Stress in Prune Trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French) , 1992 .

[30]  Gaylon S. Campbell,et al.  Irrigation Scheduling Using Soil Moisture Measurements: Theory and Practice , 1982 .

[31]  W. Lentz,et al.  Model applications in horticulture: a review , 1998 .

[32]  A. Naor,et al.  Irrigation Scheduling and Evaluation of Tree Water Status in Deciduous Orchards , 2010 .

[33]  H. G. Jones.  Plant water relations and implications for irrigation scheduling. , 1990 .

[34]  J. Lockhart.  An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. , 1965, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  H. Jones.  Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[36]  Melvin T. Tyree,et al.  A new stem hygrometer, corrected for temperature gradients and calibrated against the pressure bomb , 1984 .

[37]  R. Zweifel,et al.  Dynamics of water storage in mature subalpine Picea abies: temporal and spatial patterns of change in stem radius. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[38]  A. Naor,et al.  Stem water potential and apple size. , 1995 .

[39]  J G Huguet,et al.  A biophysical analysis of stem and root diameter variations in woody plants. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[40]  Kathy Steppe,et al.  A mathematical model linking tree sap flow dynamics to daily stem diameter fluctuations and radial stem growth. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[41]  Irrigation Scheduling: Plant Indicators (Measurement) , 2007 .

[42]  Janine Hasey,et al.  Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees , 1997 .

[43]  D. Intrigliolo,et al.  Usefulness of diurnal trunk shrinkage as a water stress indicator in plum trees. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[44]  Joan Girona,et al.  Sensitivity of Continuous and Discrete Plant and Soil Water Status Monitoring in Peach Trees Subjected to Deficit Irrigation , 1999 .