Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks.

Prior knowledge was varied in problem solving, thinking, and reading tasks in three experiments. The hypothesis was that the prior knowledge used in a cognitive task uses capacity in the same limited capacity active processing system that is used to process the ongoing task. In a reading experiment, prior knowledge about a target page was manipulated by controlling the preceding pages. In an experiment dealing with problem solving in the context of a chess game, prior knowledge was controlled by comparing experts with novices. In a third study subjects thought about personality descriptions of persons and groups, and about women's fashions and football plays; it was assumed that persons have more prior knowledge concerning the personality of persons than the personality of groups, that women have more prior knowledge about women's fashions, and that men have more prior knowledge about football. In all experiments, use of cognitive capacity in task performance was observed with a secondary task technique. The results of all three experiments were consistent with the hypothesis that prior knowledge uses capacity in the active processing system. The prior knowledge hypothesis is consistent with some aspects of current cognitive theory but not consistent with others. The results also suggest a fundamental and unexpected limit on the cognitive processing of experts.

[1]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Use of Cognitive Capacity in Reading Easy and Difficult Text: Two Tests of an Allocation of Attention Hypothesis1 , 1980 .

[2]  S. Klapp,et al.  Response programming in simple and choice reactions. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning. , 1979 .

[4]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[5]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surf ace structure on decision times , 1969 .

[7]  R. Gagne Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[8]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[9]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Effects of text difficulty. , 1978 .

[10]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Use of Cognitive Capacity in Reading: A Performance Operating Characteristic , 1981 .

[11]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[12]  D. J. Schneider,et al.  Implicit personality theory: A review. , 1973 .

[13]  W. T. Norman,et al.  A universal conception of personality structure? , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  D. Dooling,et al.  Effects of comprehension on retention of prose , 1971 .

[15]  C. Osgood The similarity paradox in human learning; a resolution. , 1949, Psychological review.

[16]  Christopher Leone,et al.  Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change , 1977 .

[17]  Harold L Hawkins,et al.  The Case against Secondary Task Analyses of Mental Workload. , 1980 .

[18]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[19]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[20]  John R. Anderson Effects of prior knowledge on memory for new information , 1981 .

[21]  A. D. D. Groot Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[22]  W. Johnston,et al.  Divided attention: a vehicle for monitoring memory processes. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[24]  E. Martin Transfer of verbal paired associates. , 1965, Psychological review.

[25]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[26]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[27]  S. Tyler,et al.  Cognitive Effort and Memory , 1979 .

[28]  Jerrold M. Levine,et al.  Measurement of Workload by Secondary Tasks , 1979 .

[29]  J. Lachman,et al.  Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing: An Introduction , 1979 .

[30]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Use of Cognitive Capacity in Reading: Effects of Some Content Features of Text. , 1983 .

[31]  B. Kerr,et al.  Processing demands during mental operations , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[32]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Effects of Text Structure on Use of Cognitive Capacity during Reading. , 1982 .

[33]  Seymour Rosenberg,et al.  Structural Representations of Implicit Personality Theory1 , 1972 .

[34]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Adjunct question effects , 1978 .

[35]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[37]  Effects of Contextual Organization on Prose Retention. , 1977 .

[38]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[39]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[40]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[41]  D. Kahneman Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[42]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[43]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Use of Cognitive Capacity in Reading: Effects of Processing Information from Text for Immediate Recall and Retention , 1980 .

[44]  D. J. Foss Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times , 1969 .