Strain Rate and Timing of Stimulation in Mechanical Modulation of Fracture Healing

Fracture of the long bones results in a repair process that has the potential to restore the anatomic morphology and mechanical integrity of the bone without scar tissue. The repair process can occur in two patterns. In the first, under conditions of rigid stabilization, direct osteonal remodeling of the fracture line can occur with little or no external callus, a process known as direct bone repair. The second pattern of repair involves bridging of the fragments with external callus and formation of bone in the fracture site by endochondral healing. This type of repair is known as indirect bone healing and occurs under less rigid interfragmentary stabilization. The rate of healing and the extent of callus in this type of repair can be modulated by the mechanical conditions at the fracture site. Applying cyclic interfragmentary micromotion for short periods has been shown to influence the repair process significantly, and characteristics of this stimulus influence the healing response observed. In the current study, a short term interfragmentary cyclic micromovement applied at a high strain rate induced a greater amount of periosteal callus than the same stimulus applied at a low strain rate. This high strain rate stimulus applied later in the healing period significantly inhibited the progress of healing. The beneficial effect of this particular biophysic stimulus early in the healing period may be related to the viscoelastic nature of the differentiating connective tissues in the early endochondral callus. In the early endochondral callus, high rates of movement induce a greater deformation of the fracture fragments because of the stiffening of the callus. Alternatively, the transduction pathway may involve streaming potentials as a result of the high movement rate.

[1]  P Augat,et al.  Effect of dynamization on gap healing of diaphyseal fractures under external fixation. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  J Kenwright,et al.  The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  A Sarmiento,et al.  Fracture healing in rat femora as affected by functional weight-bearing. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  S. Perren,et al.  Biomechanics of fracture healing. , 1980, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[5]  E Y Chao,et al.  Effects of axial dynamization on bone healing. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  M. Dabalà,et al.  Mechanical monitoring of fracture healing using ultrasound imaging. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  J Kenwright,et al.  Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  E Schneider,et al.  Early temporary porosis of bone induced by internal fixation implants. A reaction to necrosis, not to stress protection? , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  L. Lanyon,et al.  The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  L. Claes,et al.  Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  E. Chao,et al.  The effects of physiologic dynamic compression on bone healing under external fixation. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  J. Lazo-Zbikowski,et al.  Biocompression external fixation. Sliding external osteosynthesis. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  A. E. Goodship,et al.  The effect of different regimes of axial micromovement on the healing of experimental tibial fractures , 1987 .

[14]  J Kenwright,et al.  The role of fixator frame stiffness in the control of fracture healing. An experimental study. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  G. Bastiani,et al.  The treatment of fractures with a dynamic axial fixator. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Early strain‐related changes in enzyme activity in osteocytes following bone loading in vivo , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  J L Cunningham,et al.  The measurement of stiffness of fractures treated with external fixation. , 1987, Engineering in medicine.

[18]  A. Goodship,et al.  Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  J L Cunningham,et al.  Design and performance of a fracture monitoring transducer. , 1988, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[20]  J L Cunningham,et al.  Axial movement and tibial fractures. A controlled randomised trial of treatment. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  S M Perren,et al.  Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  G V Cochran,et al.  Streaming potentials in healing, remodeling, and intact cortical bone , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.