Hebbian Learning of Context in Recurrent Neural Networks

Single electrode recordings in the inferotemporal cortex of monkeys during delayed visual memory tasks provide evidence for attractor dynamics in the observed region. The persistent elevated delay activities could be internal representations of features of the learned visual stimuli shown to the monkey during training. When uncorrelated stimuli are presented during training in a fixed sequence, these experiments display significant correlations between the internal representations. Recently a simple model of attractor neural network has reproduced quantitatively the measured correlations. An underlying assumption of the model is that the synaptic matrix formed during the training phase contains in its efficacies information about the contiguity of persistent stimuli in the training sequence. We present here a simple unsupervised learning dynamics that produces such a synaptic matrix if sequences of stimuli are repeatedly presented to the network at fixed order. The resulting matrix is then shown to convert temporal correlations during training into spatial correlations between attractors. The scenario is that, in the presence of selective delay activity, at the presentation of each stimulus, the activity distribution in the neural assembly contains information of both the current stimulus and the previous one (carried by the attractor). Thus the recurrent synaptic matrix can code not only for each of the stimuli presented to the network but also for their context. We combine the idea that for learning to be effective, synaptic modification should be stochastic, with the fact that attractors provide learnable information about two consecutive stimuli. We calculate explicitly the probability distribution of synaptic efficacies as a function of training protocol, that is, the order in which stimuli are presented to the network. We then solve for the dynamics of a network composed of integrate-and-fire excitatory and inhibitory neurons with a matrix of synaptic collaterals resulting from the learning dynamics. The network has a stable spontaneous activity, and stable delay activity develops after a critical learning stage. The availability of a learning dynamics makes possible a number of experimental predictions for the dependence of the delay activity distributions and the correlations between them, on the learning stage and the learning protocol. In particular it makes specific predictions for pair-associates delay experiments.

[1]  D. Zipser,et al.  A spiking network model of short-term active memory , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  Davide Badoni,et al.  LANN27: an electronic implementation of an analog attractor neural network with stochastic learning , 1995, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  N Brunel,et al.  Correlations of cortical Hebbian reverberations: theory versus experiment , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Prof. Dr. Valentino Braitenberg,et al.  Anatomy of the Cortex , 1991, Studies of Brain Function.

[5]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Paradigmatic Working Memory (Attractor) Cell in IT Cortex , 1997, Neural Computation.

[6]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Quantitative Study of Attractor Neural Network Retrieving at Low Spike Rates: I , 1991 .

[7]  J. Fuster Memory in the cerebral cortex , 1994 .

[8]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.

[9]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  The Hebbian paradigm reintegrated: Local reverberations as internal representations , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  K. Stratford,et al.  Synaptic transmission between individual pyramidal neurons of the rat visual cortex in vitro , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  W. Levy,et al.  Temporal contiguity requirements for long-term associative potentiation/depression in the hippocampus , 1983, Neuroscience.

[12]  B. Gustafsson,et al.  Long-term potentiation in the hippocampus using depolarizing current pulses as the conditioning stimulus to single volley synaptic potentials , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Learning internal representations in an attractor neural network with analogue neurons , 1995 .

[14]  J. Fuster Behavioral electrophysiology of the prefrontal cortex , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  Davide Badoni,et al.  Electronic implementation of an analogue attractor neural network with stochastic learning , 1995 .

[16]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Global Spontaneous Activity and Local Structured (learned) Delay Activity in Cortex , 1995 .

[17]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Conversion of Temporal Correlations Between Stimuli to Spatial Correlations Between Attractors , 1999, Neural Computation.

[18]  H. C. LONGUET-HIGGINS,et al.  Non-Holographic Associative Memory , 1969, Nature.

[19]  Asohan Amarasingham,et al.  Predicting the Distribution of Synaptic Strengths and Cell Firing Correlations in a Self-Organizing, Sequence Prediction Model , 1998, Neural Computation.

[20]  H Niki,et al.  Prefrontal unit activity during delayed alternation in the monkey. I. Relation to direction of response. , 1974, Brain research.

[21]  J. Fuster,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons distinguish and retain behaviorally relevant features of visual stimuli. , 1981, Science.

[22]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortexYasushi Miyashita , 1988, Nature.

[23]  D. Amit The Hebbian paradigm reintegrated: Local reverberations as internal representations , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[25]  Ralph Linsker,et al.  An Application of the Principle of Maximum Information Preservation to Linear Systems , 1988, NIPS.

[26]  Y. Miyashita Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex , 1988, Nature.

[27]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Learning in Neural Networks with Material Synapses , 1994, Neural Computation.

[28]  D. Amit,et al.  Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Dynamics of an attractor neural network converting temporal into spatial correlations Network: Compu , 1994 .

[30]  J. Changeux,et al.  A Simple Model of Prefrontal Cortex Function in Delayed-Response Tasks , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Fuster Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed-response performance: neuronal correlates of transient memory. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Keiji Tanaka Inferotemporal cortex and higher visual functions , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  E. Fetz,et al.  Intracortical connectivity revealed by spike-triggered averaging in slice preparations of cat visual cortex , 1988, Brain Research.

[34]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Dissociation of object and spatial processing domains in primate prefrontal cortex. , 1993, Science.