Journal policy on research funded by the tobacco industry

As editors of the BMJ , Heart , Thorax and BMJ Open , we have decided that the journals will no longer consider for publication any study that is partly or wholly funded by the tobacco industry. Our new policy is consistent with those of other journals including PLoS Medicine , PLoS One , PLoS Biology ;1 Journal of Health Psychology ;2 journals published by the American Thoracic Society;3 and the BMJ 's own Tobacco Control. 4 Critics may argue—as many did when journals stopped publishing cigarette advertisements—that publishing such research does not constitute endorsing its findings and that, as long as funding sources are fully disclosed, readers can consider that information and make up their own minds about the quality of the work. Peer review should prevail, goes this line of thinking: it's not the editor's job to make these kinds of judgments. However, this view ignores the growing body of evidence that biases and research misconduct are often impossible …

[1]  R. Malone Changing Tobacco Control's policy on tobacco industry-funded research , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[2]  Katherine Kenny Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition , 2012 .

[3]  Robert N Proctor,et al.  The history of the discovery of the cigarette–lung cancer link: evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[4]  P. McDonald,et al.  Softening up on the hardening hypothesis , 2012, Tobacco Control.

[5]  Drummond Rennie,et al.  Integrity in scientific publishing. , 2010, Health services research.

[6]  E. Veitch,et al.  A New Policy on Tobacco Papers , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[7]  R. Slimowitz The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product That Defined America , 2008 .

[8]  S. Glantz,et al.  The limits of competing interest disclosures. , 2005, Tobacco control.

[9]  L. Bero,et al.  Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. , 1998, JAMA.

[10]  T. Houston The Cigarette Papers , 1996 .

[11]  S. Chapman The Cigarette Papers , 1996 .

[12]  D F Marks,et al.  A higher principle is at stake than simply freedom of speech , 1996, BMJ.

[13]  S. Tibby,et al.  Paediatric intensive care beds: the problem is distribution rather than numbers , 1996, BMJ.

[14]  A. Caplan Should our journals publish research sponsored by the tobacco industry? Con: the smoking lamp should not be lit in ATS/ALA publications. , 1995, American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology.

[15]  D. Rennie,et al.  Publication bias and public health policy on environmental tobacco smoke. , 1994, JAMA.

[16]  M. Daube Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition , 2012 .

[17]  Allan M. Brandt,et al.  The Cigarette Century: The Rise, Fall, and Deadly Persistence of the Product that Defined America , 2007 .