The consequences for women in the academic profession of the widespread use of fixed term contracts

Women have been disadvantaged within the academic profession due to its gendered nature. Some commentators have alleged that temporary contracts may create opportunities for women and that women exhibit a stronger preference for such contracts than men. Over recent years, there has been a sharp rise in the proportion of academic staff employed on fixed term contracts in UK universities. This article examines whether the consequence of this has been to create a bridge for women, leading into and upwards within the profession, or a trap. Drawing on new empirical evidence gathered from academic staff, the conclusions are that segregation is decreasing slowly, but not because of fixed term contracts, and that fixed term contracts create traps and profound disadvantages for both sexes. Women are slightly disadvantaged by forms of patronage that operate to permit some fixed term staff to gain more secure posts. Moreover, relative to men, these professional women neither gain nor perceive any comparative benefits from fixed term contracts as opposed to open-ended contracts.

[1]  Short-term research contracts , 1980, Nature.

[2]  G. Standing,et al.  Global feminization through flexible labor , 1989 .

[3]  J. Rubery,et al.  An Empirical Investigation into the Segmentation of the Labour Supply , 1990 .

[4]  S. Acker.  New perspectives on an old problem: the position of women academics in British higher education , 1992 .

[5]  Barbara Bagilhole,et al.  How to Keep a Good Woman Down: an investigation of the role of institutional factors in the process of discrimination against women academics , 1993 .

[6]  Jouko Nätti,et al.  Temporary Employment in the Nordic Countries: A `Trap' or a `Bridge'? , 1993 .

[7]  Daniel C. Feldman,et al.  Managing temporary workers: A permanent HRM challenge , 1994 .

[8]  L. Morley.  Glass Ceiling or Iron Cage: Women in UK Academia , 1994 .

[9]  Martin Parker,et al.  The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity , 1995 .

[10]  J. West.  The trouble with equal opportunities: the case of women academics , 1995 .

[11]  S. Morris,et al.  Employers' use of temporary workers , 1996 .

[12]  Christine Heward,et al.  Gender, Race and Career Success in the Academic Profession , 1997 .

[13]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Temporary Employment: Can Organizations and Employees Both Win? , 1997 .

[14]  Janet Walsh,et al.  Understanding the peripheral workforce: evidence from the service sector , 1999 .

[15]  Maureen Padfield,et al.  Work Orientations and Women's Work: A Critique of Hakim's Theory of the Heterogeneity of Women , 1999 .

[16]  C. Bryson,et al.  Working in higher education in the United Kingdom , 2000 .

[17]  Academic staff in Europe: Changing employment and working conditions , 2000 .

[18]  D. Reay.  “Dim dross”: Marginalised women both inside and outside the academy , 2000 .

[19]  The casualisation of employment in higher education in the United Kingdom , 2000 .

[20]  V. Hey.  The construction of academic time: sub/contracting academic labour in research , 2001 .

[21]  Sandra Harley,et al.  The Impact of Research Selectivity on Academic Work and Identity in UK Universities , 2002 .