Clinical and Ultrastructural Characteristics of Graft Failure in DMEK: 1-Year Results After Repeat DMEK

Purpose: To evaluate the role of preexisting corneal pathology on the outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), and also to evaluate the long-term outcome of repeat DMEK for graft failure after primary DMEK. Methods: Eighteen patients undergoing repeat DMEK after failed DMEK were enrolled; 9 of 18 patients had successful primary DMEK on the fellow eye. Evaluations included preoperative anterior chamber depth, intraoperative degree of difficulty, transmission electron microscopy images (n = 14), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, corneal volume, and patient satisfaction. Results: Surgeries that led to graft failure had a higher intraoperative degree of difficulty compared with successful surgeries (P = 0.002). Eight of 14 failed grafts showed ultrastructural abnormalities, that is, inclusions or deposits of abnormal fibrillar material in Descemet membrane, indicating endothelial dysfunction before transplantation. BCVA on day 10 after surgery was worse in eyes with graft failure compared with successful DMEK (P = 0.008). Median BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) improved from 0.5 before DMEK and 1.9 before repeat DMEK to 0.3 at 1-year follow-up (P = 0.011). One year after repeat DMEK, endothelial cell density (cells/mm2) of donor corneas decreased from 2501 ± 264 to 1373 ± 270 (P < 0.001), central corneal thickness (µm) decreased from 807 ± 160 to 576 ± 178 (P = 0.002), and corneal volume (mm3) decreased from 84.1 ± 13.0 to 64.4 ± 12.5 (P = 0.002). Patient satisfaction showed no difference between primary and repeat DMEK. Conclusions: A preexisting subclinical corneal endothelial dysfunction may contribute to primary DMEK failure. Repeat DMEK can be performed safely with good long-term outcome.

[1]  K. Bartz-Schmidt,et al.  Histological and ultrastructural findings of corneal tissue after failed descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Acta ophthalmologica.

[2]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Graft adhesion in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal of host's descemet membrane. , 2014, JAMA ophthalmology.

[3]  N. Oblanca,et al.  Comparison of corneal haze and visual outcome in primary DSAEK versus DSAEK following failed DMEK , 2013, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  P. Steven,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes with Glaucoma Implants , 2013, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty surgery: update on the evidence and hurdles to acceptance , 2013, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[6]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Reproducibility of graft preparations in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Claus Cursiefen,et al.  Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty--rapid recovery of visual acuity. , 2013, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[8]  Ruth Quilendrino,et al.  Near complete visual recovery and refractive stability in modern corneal transplantation: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2013, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[9]  F. Horn,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: advanced triple procedure. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  F. Kruse,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  J. Parker,et al.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in phakic eyes , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  D. Tan,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution. , 2012, Survey of ophthalmology.

[13]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[14]  F. Kruse,et al.  Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[15]  Frederico P. Guerra,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[16]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Efficacy of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcome of 200 consecutive cases after a learning curve of 25 cases. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Learning Curve in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: First Series of 135 Consecutive Cases. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[18]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Characterization of the cleavage plane in DESCemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[19]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Myofibroblast metaplasia after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  A Stepwise Approach to Donor Preparation and Insertion Increases Safety and Outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[21]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[22]  I. Dapena,et al.  Back-up procedure for graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[23]  G. Melles,et al.  Causes of primary donor failure in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  G. Melles,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2006, Cornea.

[25]  J T Holladay,et al.  Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. , 1997, Journal of refractive surgery.

[26]  A. Nesburn,et al.  Extracellular matrix alterations in human corneas with bullous keratopathy. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  E. Cohen,et al.  Retrocorneal fibrous membranes in failed corneal grafts. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  J. Alvarado,et al.  Prenatal and postnatal growth of the human Descemet's membrane. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  R. Campbell,et al.  The ultrastructure of Descemet's membrane. I. Changes with age in normal corneas. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  G. Waring Posterior collagenous layer of the cornea. Ultrastructural classification of abnormal collagenous tissue posterior to Descemet's membrane in 30 cases. , 1982, Archives of ophthalmology.