Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World: Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling

This article reports the results of a survey of women in legislatures and executives around the world as they were constituted in 1998 (N = 180). The chief hypotheses regarding the factors hindering or facilitating women's access to political representation were tested by multivariate regression models. The regression models juxtaposed a cocktail of institutional, political, cultural, and socioeconomic variables with the following dependent variables: (1) the percentage of MPs who are women and (2) the percentage of cabinet ministers who are women. A number, although not all, of the cited hypotheses were statistically confirmed and more finely quantified. The socioeconomic development of women in society has an effect on the number of women in parliament but not in the cabinet. A country's length of experience with multipartyism and women's enfranchisement correlates with both the legislative and the executive percentage. Certain electoral systems are more women friendly than others. The ideological nature of the party system affects the number of women elected and chosen for cabinet posts. And last, the state's dominant religion, taken as a proxy for culture, also statistically relates to the number of women who will make it to high political office. However, other long-held hypotheses were not proved. The degree of democracy is not a good indicator of the percentage of women who will make it into the legislature or the cabinet, nor is the dichotomy between a presidential or parliamentary system.

[1]  J. Mill.  Considerations on Representative Government , 1861 .

[2]  John Stuart Mill,et al.  The Subjection of Women , 2017 .

[3]  M. Duverger.  The political role of women , 1955 .

[4]  Rein Taagepera,et al.  “Effective” Number of Parties , 1979 .

[5]  G. Saltzstein.  Female Mayors and Women in Municipal Jobs , 1986 .

[6]  W. Rule.  Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies , 1987 .

[7]  Michelle A. Saint-Germain,et al.  Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in Arizona Legislature. , 1989 .

[8]  Arend Lijphart.  Debate—Proportional Representation: Double-Checking the Evidence , 2008 .

[9]  Sue Thomas.  The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[10]  Karen Beckwith.  Comparative Research and Electoral Systems:: Lessons from France and Italy , 1992 .

[11]  Controversies In Minority Voting , 1992 .

[12]  Paul Williams,et al.  London ambulance service inquiry , 1993 .

[13]  P. Norris,et al.  Gender and party politics , 1993 .

[14]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities , 1994 .

[15]  Women's Underrepresentation and Electoral Systems , 1994 .

[16]  S. Lipset.  The encyclopedia of democracy , 1995 .

[17]  G. Geisler.  Troubled Sisterhood: Women and Politics in Southern Africa: Case Studies From Zambia, Zimbabwe and Botswana , 1995 .

[18]  M. Jones.  Increasing Women's Representation Via Gender Quotas:: The Argentine Ley de Cupos , 1996 .

[19]  G. Waylen.  Gender In Third World Politics , 1996 .

[20]  R. Davis.  Women and Power in Parliamentary Democracies: Cabinet Appointments in Western Europe, 1968-1992 , 1997 .

[21]  Miki Caul.  Women's Representation in Parliament , 1999 .