Recruitment of KMT2C/MLL3 to DNA Damage Sites Mediates DNA Damage Responses and Regulates PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Cancer

This study uncovers a critical role for KMT2C in DDR via direct recruitment to DNA damage sites, identifying high-frequency KMT2C/D mutations as biomarkers for response to PARP inhibition in cancer. When recruited to promoters, histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methyltransferases KMT2 (KMT2A-D) activate transcription by opening chromatin through H3K4 methylation. Here, we report that KMT2 mutations occur frequently in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are associated with high mutation loads and poor survival. KMT2C regulated DNA damage responses (DDR) through direct recruitment to DNA damage sites by Ago2 and small noncoding DNA damage response RNA, where it mediates H3K4 methylation, chromatin relaxation, secondary recruitment of DDR factors, and amplification of DDR signals along chromatin. Furthermore, by disrupting homologous recombination (HR)–mediated DNA repair, KMT2C/D mutations sensitized NSCLC to Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), whose efficacy is unclear in NSCLC due to low BRCA1/2 mutation rates. These results demonstrate a novel, transcription-independent role of KMT2C in DDR and identify high-frequency KMT2C/D mutations as much-needed biomarkers for PARPi therapies in NSCLC and other cancers with infrequent BRCA1/2 mutations. Significance: This study uncovers a critical role for KMT2C in DDR via direct recruitment to DNA damage sites, identifying high-frequency KMT2C/D mutations as biomarkers for response to PARP inhibition in cancer.

[1]  A. Scorilas,et al.  The lysine‐specific methyltransferase KMT2C/MLL3 regulates DNA repair components in cancer , 2019, EMBO reports.

[2]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  Addendum: The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[3]  B. Fang,et al.  Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancers: biomarkers for predicting responses and strategies to overcome resistance , 2018, BMC Cancer.

[4]  T A Chan,et al.  Development of tumor mutation burden as an immunotherapy biomarker: utility for the oncology clinic , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  X. Guan,et al.  Therapeutic landscape in mutational triple negative breast cancer , 2018, Molecular Cancer.

[6]  Weijun Su,et al.  miR-30 Disrupts Senescence and Promotes Cancer by Targeting both p16INK4A and DNA Damage Pathways , 2018, Oncogene.

[7]  J. Bosch-Barrera,et al.  Combination of gefitinib and olaparib versus gefitinib alone in EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A randomized phase 2 study (GOAL, Spanish Lung Cancer Group). , 2018 .

[8]  Robert A. Baldock,et al.  Drosha drives the formation of DNA:RNA hybrids around DNA break sites to facilitate DNA repair , 2018, Nature Communications.

[9]  Joonyoung Her,et al.  How cells ensure correct repair of DNA double-strand breaks , 2018, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Ahmet Zehir,et al.  Molecular Determinants of Response to Anti-Programmed Cell Death (PD)-1 and Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Blockade in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Profiled With Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. Murphy,et al.  p53 orchestrates DNA replication restart homeostasis by suppressing mutagenic RAD52 and POLθ pathways , 2018, eLife.

[12]  Chi-Ching Lee,et al.  mSignatureDB: a database for deciphering mutational signatures in human cancers , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Joonyoung Her,et al.  BLM helicase regulates DNA repair by counteracting RAD51 loading at DNA double-strand break sites , 2017, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  G. Shivashankar,et al.  Damage-induced lncRNAs control the DNA damage response through interaction with DDRNAs at individual double-strand breaks , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  V. Thorsson,et al.  Mutational Landscapes of Smoking-Related Cancers in Caucasians and African Americans: Precision Oncology Perspectives at Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center , 2017, Theranostics.

[16]  G. Legube,et al.  Histone demethylase KDM5A regulates the ZMYND8–NuRD chromatin remodeler to promote DNA repair , 2017, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  Yiling Lu,et al.  Multiplatform-based Molecular Subtypes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2016, Oncogene.

[18]  S. Cantor,et al.  Replication Fork Stability Confers Chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient Cells , 2016, Nature.

[19]  S. Francia,et al.  DICER, DROSHA and DNA damage response RNAs are necessary for the secondary recruitment of DNA damage response factors , 2016, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  B. Taylor,et al.  deconstructSigs: delineating mutational processes in single tumors distinguishes DNA repair deficiencies and patterns of carcinoma evolution , 2016, Genome Biology.

[21]  Qinhong Wang,et al.  Small RNAs Recruit Chromatin-Modifying Enzymes MMSET and Tip60 to Reconfigure Damaged DNA upon Double-Strand Break and Facilitate Repair. , 2016, Cancer research.

[22]  Michael P. Morrissey,et al.  Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets , 2015, Nature.

[23]  A. Dingwall,et al.  The cancer COMPASS: navigating the functions of MLL complexes in cancer. , 2015, Cancer genetics.

[24]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[25]  Y. Qi,et al.  Ago2 facilitates Rad51 recruitment and DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination , 2014, Cell Research.

[26]  S. Jackson,et al.  Transcriptionally active chromatin recruits homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[27]  Yi Zhou,et al.  Quantitation of DNA double-strand break resection intermediates in human cells , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  Weiqun Peng,et al.  H3K4 mono- and di-methyltransferase MLL4 is required for enhancer activation during cell differentiation , 2013, eLife.

[29]  Li-Huei Tsai,et al.  Interaction of FUS and HDAC1 regulates DNA damage response and repair in neurons , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Jeyasekharan,et al.  A cancer-associated BRCA2 mutation reveals masked nuclear export signals controlling localization , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  Weijun Su,et al.  Induction of p38δ Expression Plays an Essential Role in Oncogenic ras-Induced Senescence , 2013, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[32]  J. Yates,et al.  A posttranslational modification cascade involving p38, Tip60, and PRAK mediates oncogene-induced senescence. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[33]  Linda Z. Shi,et al.  Microhomology-mediated End Joining and Homologous Recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal , 2013, Science Signaling.

[35]  D. Durocher,et al.  Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[36]  Leng Han,et al.  Investigating the relationship of DNA methylation with mutation rate and allele frequency in the human genome , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[37]  Piero Carninci,et al.  Site-specific DICER and DROSHA RNA products control the DNA damage response , 2012, Nature.

[38]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[39]  Linda Z. Shi,et al.  CtIP Protein Dimerization Is Critical for Its Recruitment to Chromosomal DNA Double-stranded Breaks* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  Yun-Gui Yang,et al.  A Role for Small RNAs in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair , 2012, Cell.

[41]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[42]  J. Bartek,et al.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  Liewei Wang,et al.  MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites , 2010, Nature.

[44]  Jiahuai Han,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology the Mir-17-92 Cluster of Micrornas Confers Tumorigenicity by Inhibiting Oncogene-induced Senescence , 2022 .

[45]  S. Elledge,et al.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[46]  Bing Xia,et al.  Cooperation of breast cancer proteins PALB2 and piccolo BRCA2 in stimulating homologous recombination , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[47]  D. Trouche,et al.  Deciphering the chromatin landscape induced around DNA double strand breaks , 2010, Cell cycle.

[48]  Imen Lassadi,et al.  High‐resolution profiling of γH2AX around DNA double strand breaks in the mammalian genome , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[49]  Junjie Chen,et al.  Assembly of checkpoint and repair machineries at DNA damage sites. , 2010, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[50]  R. Roeder,et al.  A tumor suppressive coactivator complex of p53 containing ASC-2 and histone H3-lysine-4 methyltransferase MLL3 or its paralogue MLL4 , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  D. Bartel MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions , 2009, Cell.

[52]  M. Zavolan,et al.  Molecular characterization of human Argonaute-containing ribonucleoprotein complexes and their bound target mRNAs. , 2008, RNA.

[53]  Xiaohua Wu,et al.  Cell Cycle-dependent Complex Formation of BRCA1·CtIP·MRN Is Important for DNA Double-strand Break Repair* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  C. Allis,et al.  Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3: intricacy of writing and reading a single epigenetic mark. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[55]  V. Costanzo,et al.  ATM and ATR promote Mre11 dependent restart of collapsed replication forks and prevent accumulation of DNA breaks , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[56]  J. Bartek,et al.  Imaging of protein movement induced by chromosomal breakage: tiny ‘local’ lesions pose great ‘global’ challenges , 2005, Chromosoma.

[57]  D. Mittelman,et al.  DNA end joining becomes less efficient and more error-prone during cellular senescence. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  R. G. Lloyd,et al.  Recombinational repair and restart of damaged replication forks , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[59]  Shuang Huang,et al.  Sequential Activation of the MEK-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and MKK3/6-p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways Mediates Oncogenic ras-Induced Premature Senescence , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[60]  E. Rogakou,et al.  Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[61]  Bart Deplancke,et al.  Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled to detection by quantitative real-time PCR to study transcription factor binding to DNA in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[62]  R. Monnat,et al.  Assessment of protein dynamics and DNA repair following generation of DNA double-strand breaks at defined genomic sites , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[63]  Z. Herceg,et al.  Histone acetylation by Trrap–Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.