Seeing without Knowing: Neural Signatures of Perceptual Inference in the Absence of Report

Every day, we experience a rich and complex visual world. Our brain constantly translates meaningless fragmented input into coherent objects and scenes. However, our attentional capabilities are limited, and we can only report the few items that we happen to attend to. So what happens to items that are not cognitively accessed? Do these remain fragmentary and meaningless? Or are they processed up to a level where perceptual inferences take place about image composition? To investigate this, we recorded brain activity using fMRI while participants viewed images containing a Kanizsa figure, an illusion in which an object is perceived by means of perceptual inference. Participants were presented with the Kanizsa figure and three matched nonillusory control figures while they were engaged in an attentionally demanding distractor task. After the task, one group of participants was unable to identify the Kanizsa figure in a forced-choice decision task; hence, they were “inattentionally blind.” A second group had no trouble identifying the Kanizsa figure. Interestingly, the neural signature that was unique to the processing of the Kanizsa figure was present in both groups. Moreover, within-subject multivoxel pattern analysis showed that the neural signature of unreported Kanizsa figures could be used to classify reported Kanizsa figures and that this cross-report classification worked better for the Kanizsa condition than for the control conditions. Together, these results suggest that stimuli that are not cognitively accessed are processed up to levels of perceptual interpretation.

[1]  N. Block Rich conscious perception outside focal attention , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Xuchu Weng,et al.  Perceptual Grouping without Awareness: Superiority of Kanizsa Triangle in Breaking Interocular Suppression , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  V. Lamme,et al.  No-Report Paradigms: Extracting the True Neural Correlates of Consciousness , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Michael A. Cohen,et al.  Consciousness cannot be separated from function , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  J Knopp,et al.  Processing of visual illusions in the frequency and spatial domains , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[7]  ARTHUR P. GINSBURG,et al.  Is the illusory triangle physical or imaginary? , 1975, Nature.

[8]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Preattentive Filling-in of Visual Surfaces in Parietal Extinction , 1997, Science.

[9]  Preston P. Thakral The neural substrates associated with inattentional blindness , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  Micah M. Murray,et al.  Towards a resolution of conflicting models of illusory contour processing in humans , 2012, NeuroImage.

[11]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Conscious Awareness of Flicker in Humans Involves Frontal and Parietal Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[12]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[15]  Z. Pylyshyn Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[16]  N. Block Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Confuse Your Illusion , 2013, Psychological science.

[18]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[19]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  I. Phillips No watershed for overflow: Recent work on the richness of consciousness , 2016 .

[21]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Visual Processing of Contour Patterns under Conditions of Inattentional Blindness , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[24]  G. Woodman,et al.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  H. Lau,et al.  Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  C. Frith,et al.  Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. , 1999, Science.

[27]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Perception in the Absence of Attention: Perceptual Processing in the Roelofs Effect during Inattentional Blindness , 2011, Perception.

[28]  K Nakayama,et al.  Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. , 1992, Science.

[29]  R. Malach,et al.  The topography of high-order human object areas , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  How Rich Is Consciousness? the Partial Awareness Hypothesis Opinion , 2022 .

[31]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[32]  Kathrin Finke,et al.  Preattentive surface and contour grouping in Kanizsa figures: Evidence from parietal extinction , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  A. Dale,et al.  The Representation of Illusory and Real Contours in Human Cortical Visual Areas Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Jon Driver,et al.  Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search , 1998 .

[35]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Explicit and implicit perception of illusory contours in unilateral spatial neglect: behavioural and anatomical correlates of preattentive grouping mechanisms , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  N. Block Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Imaging retinotopic maps in the human brain , 2011, Vision Research.

[38]  J. Changeux,et al.  Ongoing Spontaneous Activity Controls Access to Consciousness: A Neuronal Model for Inattentional Blindness , 2005, PLoS biology.

[39]  Eric Halgren,et al.  Cortical activation to illusory shapes as measured with magnetoencephalography , 2003, NeuroImage.

[40]  T. Denson,et al.  Brief mindfulness induction reduces inattentional blindness , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[41]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Isolating neural correlates of conscious perception from neural correlates of reporting one's perception , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[42]  M. Seghier,et al.  Functional neuroimaging findings on the human perception of illusory contours , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[43]  T. S. Lee,et al.  Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  S. Pollmann,et al.  Retinotopic Activation in Response to Subjective Contours in Primary Visual Cortex , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[45]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  A true science of consciousness explains phenomenology: comment on Cohen and Dennett , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  G. Rees,et al.  Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Roelfsema Pieter Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping , 2008 .

[48]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  The influence of inattention on the neural correlates of scene segmentation , 2006, Brain Research.

[49]  V. Lamme Towards a true neural stance on consciousness , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Sing‐Hang Cheung,et al.  Illusory contour formation survives crowding. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[51]  D. Schwarzkopf,et al.  Contextual Illusions Reveal the Limit of Unconscious Visual Processing , 2011, Psychological science.

[52]  J. Wolfe Inattentional Amnesia , 2000 .

[53]  V. Lamme How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[54]  M Dojat,et al.  Moving illusory contours activate primary visual cortex: an fMRI study. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Feedforward and Recurrent Processing in Scene Segmentation: Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[57]  G. Kanizsa Subjective contours. , 1976, Scientific American.