Research Challenges in Airborne Ad-hoc Networks (AANETs)

Wireless Ad-hoc Networks have been one of the major research issues from last one and half decade. However, the primary researches have focused on ground vehicles and random mobility scenarios. But due to recent advancements in communication technologies and signal processing techniques, nowadays, we have a new and special kind of kind of ad-hoc networks called “Airborne Ad-hoc Networks (AANETs)” in which aircrafts are implemented as nodes traveling with significant speeds. Because of unique characteristics like higher mobility, highly dynamic aeronautical environment and time-varying inter-aircraft radio link quality, there are new research challenges in AANETs. These networks can be used for enhancing the situational awareness, flight efficiency, and flight coordination in military and civilian applications. In this paper, we have presented the theoretical review of research challenges in AANETs which have been found after study of previous research papers. It has been found that current routing protocols and 2-D mobility models which are being used for typical Ad-hoc networks are not able to cope with AANETs environment. There is a requirement to implement the physical movement of aircrafts in more realistic manner. For this, AANETs need domain-specific routing protocols, geographical protocols, and hierarchical protocols along with memory-based three-dimensional mobility models to deal with the challenges of highly dynamic aeronautical environment.

[1]  Hai Wang,et al.  Design and Implementation of Adaptive MAC Framework for UAV Ad Hoc Networks , 2016, 2016 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks (MSN).

[2]  Abdul Jabbar,et al.  Highly-Dynamic Cross-Layered Aeronautical Network Architecture , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  Y. Wang,et al.  Fundamental issues in systematic design of airborne networks for aviation , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  Ehssan Sakhaee,et al.  Aeronautical ad hoc networks , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[5]  Ilker Bekmezci,et al.  Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): A survey , 2013, Ad Hoc Networks.

[6]  SeUng Hyeon,et al.  A new geographic routing protocol for aircraft ad hoc networks , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[7]  Xiaoyan Ma,et al.  Opportunistic communications in WSN using UAV , 2017, 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC).

[8]  Scott Moore,et al.  A comparison of MANET routing protocols on airborne tactical networks , 2012, MILCOM 2012 - 2012 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[9]  James P. G. Sterbenz,et al.  AeroRP performance in highly-dynamic airborne networks using 3D Gauss-Markov mobility model , 2011, 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference.

[10]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Towards a mission planning toolbox for the Airborne Network: Optimizing ground coverage under connectivity constraints , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  Abdul Jabbar,et al.  A geographical routing protocol for highly-dynamic aeronautical networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[12]  Ki-Il Kim A Simulation Study for Typical Routing Protocols in Aircraft Ad Hoc Networks , 2013 .

[13]  Ki-Il Kim,et al.  Design of hierarchical routing protocol for heterogeneous airborne ad hoc networks , 2014, The International Conference on Information Networking 2014 (ICOIN2014).

[14]  Ki-Il Kim,et al.  A Survey on Three-Dimensional Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks , 2014, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[15]  E.G. Idhaw,et al.  Quality of service (QoS) sensitivity for the OSPF protocol in the airborne networking environment , 2005, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[16]  Mohan Kumar,et al.  ROMAN: Routing and opportunistic management of airborne networks , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[17]  R. Ramirez,et al.  Link management in the Air Force airborne network , 2005, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[18]  Peng Yang,et al.  Enhanced routing protocol for fast flying UAV network , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS).

[19]  Shangguang Wang,et al.  A-GR: A novel geographical routing protocol for AANETs , 2013, J. Syst. Archit..

[20]  Diane Kiwior,et al.  Routing Protocol Performance over Intermittent Links , 2007, MILCOM 2007 - IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[21]  Xiaoheng Tan,et al.  Integrate Advantage of Geographic Routing and Reactive Mechanism for Aeronautical Ad Hoc Networks , 2015 .

[22]  F. Richard Yu,et al.  Medium Access Control for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Ad-Hoc Networks With Full-Duplex Radios and Multipacket Reception Capability , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[23]  Thomas Kunz,et al.  Unmanned Aerial ad Hoc Networks: Simulation-Based Evaluation of Entity Mobility Models’ Impact on Routing Performance , 2015 .

[24]  Ozgur Koray Sahingoz,et al.  Networking Models in Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): Concepts and Challenges , 2013, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems.